To the Lakers of course. You aren't going to let the Celtics steal players as good as Kuzma and Green just giving up Tatum are you?Hayward to who and why?
You think so? I think it's only Tony's shot accuracy that his game could benefit from, he is better on anything else...
Interesting opinion you have though... Even more interesting that you are not at shame to share it, although it may make some people think that you are an idiot for having it...
Sounds a much better comparison to me than ...Snell, who is what trojanfan12 suggested as a comparison!
Did you see the deal...? You want Bledsoe + Hayward to the Lakers for Kuzma + Green?To the Lakers of course. You aren't going to let the Celtics steal players as good as Kuzma and Green just giving up Tatum are you?
Well yeah. Kuzma and Green are terrific players and Tatum isnt worth both of them. Maybe just take Green out. Kuzma and a 2nd should be enough for the Celtics to bite.Did you see the deal...? You want Bledsoe + Hayward to the Celtics for Kuzma + Green?
Why do you care what Tatum worths? That's the Bucks problem... What is to you or to the Lakers what Tatum worths?Well yeah. Kuzma and Green are terrific players and Tatum isnt worth both of them. Maybe just take Green out. Kuzma and a 2nd should be enough for the Celtics to bite.
Well obviously it matters to the Celtics what they get for Tatum but if they think they can get BOTH Green and Kuzma AND a 2nd round pick for Tatum that's crazyWhy do you care what Tatum worths? That's the Bucks problem... What is to you or to the Lakers what Tatum worths?
The Lakers should only care for trading Kuzma + Green for Bledsoe... Lebron would happily do it ...yesterday! ...and would additionally pay for a party in Beverly Hills to welcome his buddy in LA...
Why do you care what Tatum worths? That's the Bucks problem... What is to you or to the Lakers what Tatum worths...
Well obviously it matters to the Celtics what they get for Tatum but if they think they can get BOTH Green and Kuzma AND a 2nd round pick for Tatum that's crazy
What the heck does that yutz @trojanfan12 know about B-ball, anyways?
Are you sure it's fair that you lose Bledsoe and only gain Tatum? It just seems like the Celtics are obviously winning this trade by a lot.But... why do you care? The Lakers don't take Tatum, they take Bledsoe... so what is to you what the Bucks would be prepared to pay for Tatum? It's the Bucks business ain't it?
The Bucks do tend to overpay for young talents with huge potential like Tatum... Depending of course to their future roster needs...Are you sure it's fair that you lose Bledsoe and only gain Tatum? It just seems like the Celtics are obviously winning this trade by a lot.
Ok well gotta go out with my gal for Valentine's, talk to you laterThe Bucks do tend to overpay for young talents with huge potential like Tatum... Depending of course to their future roster needs...
The Bucks now have Hill and Divincenzo to take over for next season and are developing Frank Mason and Jaylen Adams too as well as give Middleton more ballhanding and guard minutes than ever...
We will trade Bledsoe next season and we know it will make Lebron (and therefore the Lakers) "jump off his chair"...
Don't know... What you suggest with your bright mind?
Best I would think at the moment would be a 3-team deal Bucks-Lakers-Celtics... Bledsoe to the Lakers, Tatum and Kostas Antetokounmpo to the Bucks, Kuzma and Green + a 2nd the Bucks have from the Pacers to the Celtics seems quite fair...
Are you sure it's fair that you lose Bledsoe and only gain Tatum? It just seems like the Celtics are obviously winning this trade by a lot.
Now that I'm thinking better about it, I wonder what the Lakers would really pay to get Bledsoe...
Lebron James and Eric Bledsoe of the Bucks are very close friends and it is widely known that Lebron asked the Cavs to pursue and land Bledsoe in Cleveland during the 2018-19 season, after Bledsoe had asked out from Phoenix.
Report: LeBron still mad the Cavaliers didn't trade for Paul George, Eric Bledsoe
Bledsoe was training with Lebron during the 2018 off-season and before he made it public and asked out from the Suns, he already had changed his manager agency to "Klatch sports"...
Could perhaps a trade that would bring Bledsoe to the Lakers happen if the Lakers would propose a package build around Kuzma and Kostas on a sign and trade with the Bucks?
How about this:
Lakers receive: Eric Bledsoe
Celtics receive: Kuzma + Green
Bucks receive : Tatum + Kostas Antetokounmpo + 2x2nd from Lakers
Hmmm.... That's a Celtics matter and certainly not for an idiot like you to judge, but in any case, how about the Bucks keeping Kuzma?The fact that you have gone on for pages about Bucks trade scenarios on how they could acquire Tatum is beyond absurd.
I will save you time. The ONLY way the Bucks could acquire Tatum is if they traded Giannis. There is no other possible sum of picks/parts on the Bucks roster possible of returning a 21 year old all star player still on a rookie contract.
So damn stupid.
And he really believes he knows what he is talking about.
LOL.
Hmmm.... That's a Celtics matter and certainly not for an idiot like you to judge, but in any case, how about the Bucks keeping Kuzma?
For instance:
Bucks receive: Kostas Antetokounmpo + Kyle Kuzma + O.G. Anunoby
Raptors receive: Green + a 2nd from Bucks + a 2nd from Lakers
Lakers receive: Eric Bledsoe
Who fucks what you think? You are an idiot and I had enough fan of you and the other idiots here that would think the Bucks or the Celtics have the slightest interest in acquiring Kuzma!Definitely more realistic.
But as much as the Lakers need a point guard, I don’t think this makes them better.
If the Lakers falter in the playoffs, something like this could be a possibility, though I am guessing the Raptors might pause at being the 3rd team in a deal that helps Milwaukee.