BoiseStateFan27
Sir Member
wow, Nevada certainly doesn't look like the same team right now.
Lantrip should be benched for the RS Freshman, give him the on field experiance and not the Senior. Lantrip is a slow runner, makes bad reads on the option, and stares down his recievers. If he stays in the whole year, We'll be lucky to get over .500
Lantrip went back in, Nevada lost 35-34...
Lantrip didn't play poorly, but he led a FG drive in the 4th quarter when they were up 3. A TD would've put the game away, but instead TTU drove down and beat us by 1. I question Ault's decision to bring Lantrip back in at that point. Fajardo came in durring the 3rd drive and led scoring drives on 4 of 5 of the drives he played (3TD, 1FG). Lantrip only led scoring drives on 2 of 5 of the drives he played (1TD, 1FG) With 9:39 to go in the 4th, why didn't Ault keep the more running threat in Fajardo in the game, not to mention he was leading better drives. Ault says both will play this week vs Boise, but Fajardo should play, the whole game.
BTW, good luck this week Boise. Although even if Fajardo plays exclusively, doubt you'll need it.
If the game were in Reno, maybe we could have a punchers chance, but not on the Blue Turf
I can't believe Ault let Lantrip continue to play. I understand Fajardo was out with an injury, but Lantrip couldn't do anything at all. Magleby was able to out produce Lantrip on 4 passes.
It's just frustrating to see Ault put him out there series after series and get 3-and-out after 3-and-out. Don't know how long it'll be until Fajardo is back, but we will lose every game that Lantrip plays more than the majority of the snaps.