The PAC needs a bigger contract with ESP1N.
yeah, probably has nothing to do with winning teams.
The PAC needs a bigger contract with ESP1N.
Last time I checked TAMU was in the SEC.Thanks for taking the time to make the other Pac12 posters cringe
The PAC needs a bigger contract with ESP1N.
Ya it's pretty tough to build up a win loss record with an 8 game conference schedule. There's a reason the SEC voted 13 - 1 in favor of not playing each other. It's pretty sad imo when some conference opponents only meet up twice every ten years.yeah, probably has nothing to do with winning teams.
Larry Scott not cutting a deal with DTV has all but killed the PAC Network. He should have been handed his walking papers years ago.All I know since I moved to Seattle about a couple decades ago all I've heard on KJR 950 AM radio is the PAC TV contracts have sucked, still suck and will always suck unless something changes. It's an exciting conference that nobody gets to watch. SEC has CBS, ABC just takes top ten teams and ESPN is all BIG games.
Last time I checked TAMU was in the SEC.
Ya it's pretty tough to build up a win loss record with an 8 game conference schedule. There's a reason the SEC voted 13 - 1 in favor of not playing each other. It's pretty sad imo when some conference opponents only meet up twice every ten years.
And here some would think the whole idea of a conference is the chance to play fellow conference members while making conference rivals. ESP1N sure changed that.Let's see what is sad about it:
More bowl money for the SEC
More winning means more TV money
Get to watch other conferences cry about SEC
yeah, it's terrible that we have the system figured out.
What fellow PAC posters? I post on a couple of different boards, a few PAC Facebook groups and do a podcast now and then. If you're referring to the special thinking Washington posters on this board that posted that they would rather see their rivals get beat by another team even if it meant hurting Washington's chances for a conference title ... ya I don't put too much stock in those kinds of posters.And?
Your posts and threads like this make the rest of the Pac12 posters bang their head on the desk.
The playoffs could look something like this:Fudge ya, let LSU get in the discussion with 2 losses, opens us up to for the playoff discussion.
If they win the SECCG and end with two losses they'll be in the playoff. In that scenario Bama would need to have Clemson, Washington or Michigan loseI know LSU lost two close ones to two solid teams but would they make the playoffs with two losses? I mean it could happen but I think it would cause some serious controversy if it did.
The playoffs could look something like this:
Bama
LSU
TAMU
Clemson
The playoffs could look something like this:
Bama
LSU
TAMU
Clemson
I'll let this speak for itself.....
Not a good analogy. the only teams in the top ten that had a better regular season record than LSU was Ohio State and Oregon. Everyone else had two losses.
There looks to be several (more than four) teams which will finish the season with fewer than two losses. I don't think the SEC bias would overcome that...
As long as UDUB wins out they are in.... CFP committee is just trolling the Huskies a little bit.I also think Bama gets beat this weekend. I got a bad feeling about Saturday....Just wanted to let y'all know that Washington is your biggest fans right now. We hope you y'all win out the rest of this season.