-Your list, of course.
What in the world are you talking about? The OP was:-
I maybe looking at it with more thought than saying something ignorant like the current hot schools. Pretty much the entire list is in the top 50 of the World Reputation Rankings. If you excel at any of the schools you will be going to the NFL. Since RB has one of the shortest career's in the NFL, it makes sense to place higher importance on education and job placement after. Luckily for most schools recruits do not think this way or Stanford would be at the pinnacle of CFB. The last schools are more to your liking, but that is only if I could not trade my football abilities for a top flight education, no offense is intended by that.
Name your top 10 schools you think would give you the best chance to be a great running back if you had your pick.
These days a lot of offenses really do not cater to the running back. They're pass heavy and subsequently they often don't recruit offensive lineman who can run block.
-
I maybe looking at it with more thought than saying something ignorant like the current hot schools. Pretty much the entire list is in the top 50 of the World Reputation Rankings. If you excel at any of the schools you will be going to the NFL. Since RB has one of the shortest career's in the NFL, it makes sense to place higher importance on education and job placement after. Luckily for most schools recruits do not think this way or Stanford would be at the pinnacle of CFB. The last schools are more to your liking, but that is only if I could not trade my football abilities for a top flight education, no offense is intended by that.
No Georgia on that list? Really? I'll assume you simply had a brain fart.
Not if you are a running back.If I go to Georgia, I'm goin to play QB, not RB
What in the world are you talking about? The OP was:
It is way too early for even you to be drinking.
BIG12 is no fun for RBs who like to play physical football.
I would go to Kansas State before any of the Texas-Oklahoma schools to play RB.
The game has changed, and so has the mentality.
Scheme used to mean beating a team with X's and O's. What??? Isnt that exactly what Auburn and OU did to Bama??
Now it translates into what little Reggie does in backyard football... "Hurry guys, they're not ready , lets try and get them before they're ready!!!"
Alabama, Stanford, LSU, Wisconsin, and Florida State still use those principles. That's what football should look like. Not basketball on grass.
Don't get me wrong, I love the styles of offense Malzahn, Meyer, Leach, and Sumlin run. But if its only working because you're running it really fast and not allowing the defense to get in position, is it really working? Or is it just gimmicky? I'd love to see Malzahn slow down the offense, and then see how well it really works. Just out of curiosity.
Here is my full 10:
1. Stanford
2. CAL
3. Texas
4. UCLA
5. Northwestern
6. Michigan
7. Wisconsin
8. UNC
9. Oregon
10. Bama
-
I maybe looking at it with more thought than saying something ignorant like the current hot schools. Pretty much the entire list is in the top 50 of the World Reputation Rankings. If you excel at any of the schools you will be going to the NFL. Since RB has one of the shortest career's in the NFL, it makes sense to place higher importance on education and job placement after. Luckily for most schools recruits do not think this way or Stanford would be at the pinnacle of CFB. The last schools are more to your liking, but that is only if I could not trade my football abilities for a top flight education, no offense is intended by that.
Then you deviated with the Oregon pick and should have put either Florida or Georgia instead of Bama.