Zeke handcuffed

[PhoenixEagles1]

thats not assault. They might be able to go after intimidation, but not assault.

Touching someone is assault. You don’t even have to touch anyone to get charged with assault. If you go up to someone and pluck them in their head as a joke... that’s assault.

 

[PhoenixEagles1]

No over the top was your BS about the back injury and 7 figure law suit.

Neither has happened thus far so it's probably too late to claim any major injury and if he does sue his most likely award is enough for any non existent medical bills and a few dollars for personal suffering.

So IF he Sue's and wins he might get enough to buy a nice 80 inch TV.


Turns out your claim to being right was wrong after all.

So you make up some ridiculous story and sum it up with me being wrong after all. That’s freaking amazing how your brain works.
He’s already asking for “extortion” amounts but you think a lawyer is going to go after Zeek for an 80 inch TV.
I swear I don’t get how your brain works. “All he’s getting is an 80 inch TV and PE1 was wrong after all”.
You live in some fantasy land where no matter how wrong you are, you are alway right.

 

[Manster7588]

Touching someone is assault. You don’t even have to touch anyone to get charged with assault. If you go up to someone and pluck them in their head as a joke... that’s assault.

Assault requires INTENT. Bumping into someone doesn't necessarily mean intent even if your in a heated discussion

 

[PhoenixEagles1]

Assault requires INTENT. Bumping into someone doesn't necessarily mean intent even if your in a heated discussion

True

 

[Schmoopy1000]

So you make up some ridiculous story and sum it up with me being wrong after all. That’s freaking amazing how your brain works.
He’s already asking for “extortion” amounts but you think a lawyer is going to go after Zeek for an 80 inch TV.
I swear I don’t get how your brain works. “All he’s getting is an 80 inch TV and PE1 was wrong after all”.
You live in some fantasy land where no matter how wrong you are, you are alway right.

 

[Manster7588]

No over the top was your BS about the back injury and 7 figure law suit.

Neither has happened thus far so it's probably too late to claim any major injury and if he does sue his most likely award is enough for any non existent medical bills and a few dollars for personal suffering.

So IF he Sue's and wins he might get enough to buy a nice 80 inch TV.


Turns out your claim to being right was wrong after all.

@PhoenixEagles1 since you face palmed this, can you tell us where you're not wrong?

 

[GNG]

So you make up some ridiculous story and sum it up with me being wrong after all. That’s freaking amazing how your brain works.
He’s already asking for “extortion” amounts but you think a lawyer is going to go after Zeek for an 80 inch TV.
I swear I don’t get how your brain works. “All he’s getting is an 80 inch TV and PE1 was wrong after all”.
You live in some fantasy land where no matter how wrong you are, you are alway right.

Don't you ever get tired of reading your posts? I do.

 

[Manster7588]

So you make up some ridiculous story and sum it up with me being wrong after all. That’s freaking amazing how your brain works.
He’s already asking for “extortion” amounts but you think a lawyer is going to go after Zeek for an 80 inch TV.
I swear I don’t get how your brain works. “All he’s getting is an 80 inch TV and PE1 was wrong after all”.
You live in some fantasy land where no matter how wrong you are, you are alway right.

What story did I make up?

As for me saying a Lawyer would chase a 80" TV, I never said any thing even remotely to that.

Come on College Grad you can't be that dense.

 

[jarntt]

I was ripped especially by my boy Ford. I said he’s filling a million dollar suit the same day it happened. I thought that made it evident I was talking in jest... yet now we are getting news that he’s trying to “extort” Zeek.

I'm confused. You are claiming victory for saying he would sue, but you said it in jest?

 

[Schmoopy1000]

I'm confused. You are claiming victory for saying he would sue, but you said it in jest?

he was joking about his victory i think.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

I'm confused. You are claiming victory for saying he would sue, but you said it in jest?

That's not what I meant

 

[TheRangerDude]

Wrong thread

 

[handicappers]

Touching someone is assault. You don’t even have to touch anyone to get charged with assault. If you go up to someone and pluck them in their head as a joke... that’s assault.

False

 

[PhoenixEagles1]

False

Fact

 

[Manster7588]

Touching someone is assault. You don’t even have to touch anyone to get charged with assault. If you go up to someone and pluck them in their head as a joke... that’s assault.

So if you pluck someone in the head wouldn't that also include touching?

 

[handicappers]

Fact

Not a Fact.

 

[PhoenixEagles1]

So if you pluck someone in the head wouldn't that also include touching?

Yes. What’s your point?

 

[PhoenixEagles1]

I'm confused. You are claiming victory for saying he would sue, but you said it in jest?

I said “He is in the hospital right now filing a million dollar suit” in jest. Obviously joking because it was the same day. Then I said of course he’s going to sue a multimillionaire who is drunk and acting a fool.

 

[PhoenixEagles1]

he was joking about his victory i think.

Nope, I was right. I was making a point of what was going to eventually happen.

 

[Manster7588]

Yes. What’s your point?

Go back and read your post.