- Thread starter
- #1
ROMOTOOWENS
Well-Known Member
Why every preseason does it seem like we are loaded at this position. ? What do you think we keep 5 or 6
actually we are keeping 4 TEs (zero FB)going to be hard to keep 6 and 3 TE's
actually we are keeping 4 TEs (zero FB)
then I'd say 6 wides will not happen.
I think they should keep 4 RB's on the 53....no way 3 stay upright through 16 games
I wish we had the same issue at running back. If/when DeMarco goes down I don't have faith in anybody really picking up the slack. That's assuming the line actually allows anybody to get out of the backfield.
Parcells had it right when talking NFL RB
They have a bulls eye on their shirt.
I keep hearing Tanner and Dunbar both are up for the challenge of Randell.
I'd keep 4 RB before I would 4 TE's
I read where Dunbar was outperforming Randle AND Murray, but was a longshoremen to be the number 2. I think if he's playing the best, he should be the number 1. If that lights a fire under Murray's rear and helps him to battle through an injury, so be it
I don't see how we have been loaded at WR for years now. To me it seemed we knew we would have a high potential guy make the final roster. This year I think we are cutting 1 or 2 NFL quality WR's