- Thread starter
- #1
nj_cup
Well-Known Member
- 5,373
- 115
- 63
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2010
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
interesting calls in that game.
i thought the kovalchuk goal shouldve counted it clearly went in before the ref blew it dead. yet that wasnt the reason for the no goal? because kovalchuk pushed the goalie in with it? i dont get that either because why not just blow the play dead once the goalie covers the puck?
that rolston call was interesting too neither ref ESP the one trailing the play had their hand up yet it was only after the tv timeout we find out its a 4 min penalty? what if zubrus scored? ( i know thats a long shot) that shot he took sums of his career!
i thought the kovalchuk goal shouldve counted it clearly went in before the ref blew it dead. yet that wasnt the reason for the no goal? because kovalchuk pushed the goalie in with it? i dont get that either because why not just blow the play dead once the goalie covers the puck?
that rolston call was interesting too neither ref ESP the one trailing the play had their hand up yet it was only after the tv timeout we find out its a 4 min penalty? what if zubrus scored? ( i know thats a long shot) that shot he took sums of his career!