Who is onboard for trading up for Barkley?

[deanpet21]

If available, Who is onboard for trading up for Barkley. The cost would be a 2019 1st round pick. Answer yes or no and explain why we do it or not. Thanks

 

[skinsdad62]

no , not for a 2019 1st for sure not for anything because we arent a barkley away from a superbowl . if he falls too us then ok

 

[chillerdab]

No, because why would you? With Alex Smith at the helm, the redskins need as much help as possible surrounding him. They need as many picks as possible, and can find a legit running back in either this year's draft or next years without trading any picks.

 

[Sharkinva]

No, because why would you? With Alex Smith at the helm, the redskins need as much help as possible surrounding him. They need as many picks as possible, and can find a legit running back in either this year's draft or next years without trading any picks.

Fuck.. I actually agree with you...

dont do that.

 

[Ruzious]

I think you'd probably have to add a 2nd rounder - next year's to be realistic. And in that case, i would not do it.

 

[chillerdab]

Moment of clarity for you, OTP?

Don't worry: I'm sure there will be more news to complain about soon enough...

 

[skinsdad62]

polls on who thinks what doesnt really prove anything and this poll doesnt favor dean who i bet thought it would

this is KC for 2 1st rounders part dew

 

[Sharkinva]

Moment of clarity for you, OTP?

Don't worry: I'm sure there will be more news to complain about soon enough...

Actually I was thinking moment of clarity (sanity) for you.

And yes, we have Bruce Allen in charge. So Im sure there will be another Jurassic park moment, where things start of f all ohs and ahs, and end up the way they usually do.

 

[chillerdab]

That's SO FUNNY, because I was thinking moment of clarity (sanity) for YOU!

tee hee hee!

There you are, OTP: the stormclouds returning.... Back to your gloom and doom.

Stick with it!

 

[Sharkinva]

That's SO FUNNY, because I was thinking moment of clarity (sanity) for YOU!

tee hee hee!

There you are, OTP: the stormclouds returning.... Back to your gloom and doom.

Stick with it!

If it aint broke, dont fix it. Well unless you are the Redskins, in which case you just find new and headline ways to rebreak it and call it progress.

 

[GNG]

If it aint broke, dont fix it. Well unless you are the Redskins, in which case you just find new and headline ways to rebreak it and call it progress.

I'm so happy the Skins are in the NFC East...

 

[Sportster 72]

Being a Penn State fan I am all in. If we don't win then maybe SB can run for 3,000 yards in a single season. Damn the torpedo's, full speed ahead.

 

[deanpet21]

I think you'd probably have to add a 2nd rounder - next year's to be realistic. And in that case, i would not do it.

just comment on my original post. Do you do it for a 2019 first rounder? yes or no.

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

Hell fucking NO that's so Poooop

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

We need more picks not less lol wtf pooop

 

[Ruzious]

just comment on my original post. Do you do it for a 2019 first rounder? yes or no.

Change the thread title, and I might comment... if you're lucky.

 

[j_y19]

For our 1st pick in 2019? Hell no. That might very well be the first pick in that draft.

 

[Ritzarmy]

Being a Penn Stater I’d love to see Barkley as a Redskins but not to mortgage the team like we did for RG3. (Yes Yes Dean we won’t be giving up as much) If he drops past 8 I say we could think about trading up for him but the cost from #13 to #3 is to stiff for us when we don’t have a 3rd round pick. We have a good chance to land a good RB in the 2nd round but God Yes I’d love for Saquon to be a Redskin.

 

[Ritzarmy]

If available, Who is onboard for trading up for Barkley. The cost would be a 2019 1st round pick. Answer yes or no and explain why we do it or not. Thanks

I assume you mean cost would be our 2018 & 2019 1st rd Pick for Barkley correct? If so then no thanks.

 

[Sleepy T]

Being a Penn Stater I’d love to see Barkley as a Redskins but not to mortgage the team like we did for RG3. (Yes Yes Dean we won’t be giving up as much) If he drops past 8 I say we could think about trading up for him but the cost from #13 to #3 is to stiff for us when we don’t have a 3rd round pick. We have a good chance to land a good RB in the 2nd round but God Yes I’d love for Saquon to be a Redskin.

Yes, I say it is a fair enough trade for a player of his caliber. The difference to move up from #12 to say #2-4 is the equivalent of a early 1st-early 2nd round pick. Once again, I would not normally be on board to do this for a RB, but I’m tired of rolling out hot garbage we picked out if the 4th-5th round that couldn’t run their way out of a wet paper bag.