- Thread starter
- #1
1 for ND? show yourself idiot
almost as stupid as the UGA fan and the Nebraska fan not voting for the PAC 12.
Please.
I voted for ND, as long as they follow the same regulation as they do now.
2012 - ND scheduled 11 AQ conference teams currently.
2011 - ND scheduled 9 AQ conference teams
2010 - ND scheduled 7 AQ conference teams
2009 - ND scheduled 10 AQ conference teams
2008 - ND scheduled 10 AQ conference teams
If Notre Dame goes 10-2, then why not give them a BCS Bid? They have a tougher schedule every year than most AQ conference teams.
but when they schedule bottom AQ teams like Maryland, and Wake Forest those really don't even count, they're worse than most non-AQs
2012 - @ Michigan St, vs Michigan, vs Miami(FL), vs Stanford, @ Oklahoma, vs Pittsburgh, @ USC
2013 - @ Michigan, vs Michigan St, vs Oklahoma, vs Arizona St, vs USC, @ Pittsburgh, @ Stanford
I don't find those schools low quality opponents to have on the schedule. How many non-AQ teams would have a similar schedule?
I voted for the current ones minus the Big Least.
Honestly there's no reason for AQ. Take the top 10 teams.
2012 - @ Michigan St, vs Michigan, vs Miami(FL), vs Stanford, @ Oklahoma, vs Pittsburgh, @ USC
2013 - @ Michigan, vs Michigan St, vs Oklahoma, vs Arizona St, vs USC, @ Pittsburgh, @ Stanford
I don't find those schools low quality opponents to have on the schedule. How many non-AQ teams would have a similar schedule? You telling me if they beat 5 of those teams and all the weaker opponents that they don't deserve a BCS bid next 2 seasons?
as soon as ND joins a conference (or they do away with AQ for any confrence) they can get AQ status. Until then it's bullshit.