mrwallace2ku
Treehugger
- 38,407
- 4,613
- 293
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 200.00
<see any PAC officiated game for examples needed to fit your narrative here>
@GreatDayneYes, what are you saying?
@GreatDayne
Did they though?
Bad calls not only affect the play the call was made on but may also affect momentum, which is a huge part of sports, especially college sports.
Taking a TD off the board in a tight game, especially a defensive TD, is a killer.
Sometimes, I think the replay referees do not understand the concept of "indisputable".
Yes. The fumble.
go away, troll.What's not shocking is that you are still hung up on this call almost a full week later.
go away, troll.
It is decidedly worse. When everything was called on the field, you could see a guy missing a call, even a big one, badly. With the advent of replay review on every play in CFB, there is simply no excuse for missing calls like "did he score?" or "did he catch the pass?" or "did he fumble?".Nothing has changed nor gotten worse:
The Bear's stand, Montana's soup and why Jan. 1, 1979 was the greatest bowl day ever
The Rose Bowl proved to be no match for either of the games that preceded it. However, it did contribute to the historical import of the day, thanks to the second-quarter touchdown by USC tailback Charles White, who leapt from the Michigan 3 toward the goal line. He clearly lost the ball outside the 1-yard-line, clear to everyone except line judge Gilbert Marchman, who thrust his hands to the sky to signal touchdown.
In those days, of course, we waited until the following day to read accounts of the game. On the front of the Los Angeles Times on the morning of Jan. 2, the legendary Jim Murray delivered the precise amount of wisecracking that White's touchdown demanded. Murray made a career out of wisecracks, of course, but few, if any, ever matched his description of this play.
"I don't know about you," Murray wrote, "but where I grew up you were supposed to have the football with you when you went into the end zone for a touchdown. When Charles White 'scored' a touchdown with 7:28 remaining in the second period, he seemed to have forgotten one small detail -- the ball.
"An official decided it was inconsequential. I guess he figured anybody could score carrying the ball. You have to admire a man who can put points on the board without it."
I agreeWhenever you are Michigan and lose a game
It is decidedly worse. When everything was called on the field, you could see a guy missing a call, even a big one, badly. With the advent of replay review on every play in CFB, there is simply no excuse for missing calls like "did he score?" or "did he catch the pass?" or "did he fumble?".
I'll keep saying it - replay referees have no idea what "indisputable" means (apparently **some** posters don't either). Either that, or they blatantly ignore it because they can.
It is decidedly worse. When everything was called on the field, you could see a guy missing a call, even a big one, badly. With the advent of replay review on every play in CFB, there is simply no excuse for missing calls like "did he score?" or "did he catch the pass?" or "did he fumble?".
I'll keep saying it - replay referees have no idea what "indisputable" means (apparently **some** posters don't either). Either that, or they blatantly ignore it because they can.