Most NBA teams have 1 or 2 players that are much more talented then the other players on the roster.
It's not near as easy as you want to make it seem for some other player to just step in and pick up the slack.
People here are debating how much of a difference Ibaka would have made.
Why couldn't the Thunder who had time to prepare for the game without him come up with a solution?
As far as the Clippers, as discussed earlier, you can't call a foul from viewing a replay, and the refs explanation AT THE TIME was wrong. Their explanation when it happened ( couldn't tell who touched it last) had nothing to do with what as said by the league after the fact.
The poor play leading up to the bad call made it much more critical, but so what?
Many times teams blow late leads but still find a way to win the game.
And it also happens quite often that star players play fewer minutes because of early fouls and their teammates step up and at least keep their team in the game until the star player returns. Bottom line, it's up to the team to adjust when that happens, whether it was the result of a bad call or not.
As for Ibaka, I don't know how much difference he would make over the course of the series, but I don't think he'd have made much of a difference tonight.
I didn't say they could call the foul after viewing the replay. Had they called a foul initially it would have been correct. Whether the explanation at the time was correct or not, the fact is that they made the right call. There is no disputing that however they managed to do it, they got the call correct, which is the point of having replay.