Picklerick 2.0
Well-Known Member
In my opinion, yes.So even if it's successful, they hold the Giants scoreless and kick a FG to win, instead of send to OT, it was a terrible call?
In my opinion, yes.So even if it's successful, they hold the Giants scoreless and kick a FG to win, instead of send to OT, it was a terrible call?
You're a special breed who thinks that a game winning decision was a terrible call.In my opinion, yes.
Doesn't really mean much if their offense just turns it over.Big defensive stop by the Panthers...
Sure it does... Goal is to always get the ball back to your offense...Doesn't really mean much if their offense just turns it over.
Game winning decision?? Are you trolling?You're a special breed who thinks that a game winning decision was a terrible call.
If it worked the way that I outlined, it would've been a game winning decision. If the 2 pt is successful, they hold the Giants scoreless AND they kick a game WINNING field goal instead of a game TYING field goal, that call to go for 2 would've been a game winning decision.Game winning decision?? Are you trolling?
A field goal in the first quarter in a 3-0 final score is a game winning decision. Gtfo here with that. Drunk ass, when your down 4, with an extra point coming up, you take it. That is my opinion, you valling me a special creature for saying that it was my opinion is a bitch move. Be a bitch. Be treated like one.If it worked the way that I outlined, it would've been a game winning decision. If the 2 pt is successful, they hold the Giants scoreless AND they kick a game WINNING field goal instead of a game TYING field goal, that call to go for 2 would've been a game winning decision.