TxHeat
Hard Member!
Should have talked to Mark Cuban. He beat the SEC.
I thought of that when I was writing my reply but thought that Cuban can afford better lawyers than Wash.

Should have talked to Mark Cuban. He beat the SEC.
him and JD are "not cool" so there HAS to be more than that.... now there's gambling or some type of capital involved? JFC man this is just loony
Dude, your obsession with portraying JD as the antichrist is really starting to make me not take you seriously.
Dude, your obsession with portraying JD as the antichrist is really starting to make me not take you seriously.
Give it up man...Seriously...JD had fucking nothing to do with it. Accept it and move on. This is all on Wash's behavior.
I don't think he was trying to pin the blame on JD here or say he was at fault in any way. I'm guessing that JD probably isn't "cool" with Wash at all. And you know what, if I were JD I wouldn't be either. JD has EVERY right to be pissed at Wash. He has stood by Wash all these years and he gave him a second chance after the cocaine incident when others perhaps wouldn't have. And now Wash goes and does something stupid which involves at the very least infidelity to his wife and maybe more according to the rumors out there (assault, financial stuff, etc). And he quits on the team with 3 weeks left. I'm betting Terps is correct when he says his friend told him Wash and JD aren't cool. You know JD's gotta be pissed that he has to deal with this shit now on top of everything else this season. Now that more has been revealed, I don't think anyone blames JD for this (or at least I hope not).
same fucking thing. my god you people blow posts out of proportion.
"dude someone died of a car accident near JD's house."
"STOP FUCKING BLAMING JD FOR BULLSHIT GOD"
I said they werent cool. I know this because there was a scouting meeting and that was the impression JD gave off. Wash isn't even a consideration to be rehired if he requested. Not saying its JD's fault. Just said they weren't fuckin cool
You don't have to say it..The implication is there. Why else would you bring it up? It's seriously a tired trope.
Read that post again. You are insane if you think I implied anything even close to blaming JD. On the contrary, if you imply something, you should imply that RW is the one I'm blaming cuz of me pointing out facts about his lawyer.
Seriously, what sane person takes "JD and wash are not cool" as "JD is a fucking douchebag and the antichrist which is why Wash left" ?
Right after you said JD and Wash are not cool you said there has to be something more. That implies you think JD had something to do with the departure. That's not insanity on my part. That's parsing your sentence for a possible interpretation. If you didn't mean it that way, then you should have worded it better.
This was my post
"him and JD are "not cool" so there HAS to be more than that. there's gambling or some type of capital involved... JFC man this is just loony"
so I literally IMPLIED (as you put it) that it is RW's fault. Not JD's. You made it that way, cuz as you can see I didn't say anything even close