Rolltide94
Well-Known Member
I'm more 40-60 on Fisher and he is with St. Louis now
Pete Caroll was 4th choice when you guys hired him, so the right coach may not even be in the discussion at the moment.
I'm more 40-60 on Fisher and he is with St. Louis now
Pete Caroll was 4th choice when you guys hired him, so the right coach may not even be in the discussion at the moment.
maybe im just an asshole always pointing a finger. fair is fair...if I get popped for a drinking and driving...and some other guy I know damn well is drunk gets stopped a then I expect him to get the same punishment I got. maybe a bad comparison but that's how I see it.. yeah maybe cases aren't exactly the same. I think a large percentage of usc, penn st or whoever else feels they were wronged by ncaa will feel outraged if Alabama comes out of this without any substantial sanctions.
Second post where you've said the NCAA doesn't like success. Still pulling that out of your ass, or do you want to support your statement? What interest would the NCAA have in penalizing success?
Second post where you've said the NCAA doesn't like success. Still pulling that out of your ass, or do you want to support your statement? What interest would the NCAA have in penalizing success?
How has the NCAA justified their punishment of USC vs UNC? UNC more players, direct coach involvement, academic fraud, longer period of time, less money = And received LT 1/2 the penalty. Penalizing success makes as much sense as anything. The NCAA certainly has been unable or at least unwilling to provide any justification or point to what precedence was set or followed.