- Thread starter
- #101
Red_Alert
^^ Privileged ^^
3.6 yds per play isn't good enough for this staff. For some stupid fucking reason they think they need 8 yds per play. They are impatient.
I can just think back at almost every single loss and think of a game-changing play Tommy made against the coaches requests that killed us.
I can see Riley on the sideline with his head in his hands every time Tommy gets in trouble and makes a dumb decision. He definitely isn't telling him it's okay to do that.
I mean, yea 3.6 yards is fine and all......but we aren't getting 3.6 yards if we don't mix the pass in some. We aren't good enough to just line it up and pound it over and over.
We didn't throw a ton in those first 3 quarters, but when we did Tommy would take 1 out of every 5 or so plays to just improvise and do whatever the hell he felt like doing.
I absolutely agree he shouldn't be passing the ball like he is. I remember when Taylor Martinez was leading the country in passes under 10 yards and people complained that we didn't throw enough down field.
Tommy should be limited to short passes. He loves slinging it though. He has said it before.....he loves his cannon arm. I think he's spoiled. Just like the all-whites we wore. "Well, I asked Tommy what he wanted and he said all-whites because they look fly. So I know about tradition and all, but we're gonna wear all-whites for Tommy." - Coach Riley
He's passing the ball like he is because he's being told to do so. If he weren't being told to do so he'd be benched by any coach with half a fucking brain. Same goes for Fyfe against Illinois. He went out and did what he was told to do.
Result = Disaster
Most of those passes he's being told to make.
I have watched enough football to tell Tommy doesn't always go through his progressions. He throws into double coverage 65 yards down field. That is not what he's being told to do.
Where this staff is at fault in my opinion is letting him do it. They don't punish him because I think they know they have nobody else behind him. Probably the same reason they encourage him not to run.
I have a terrible fear we'll be having this same conversation throughout next season, and throughout 2017.
Similar to the HWSNBN and Bopleeny eras, Kool-Aid drinkers will take a few years to separate spoon-fed hope from reality in their heads.
It was 30 runs to 26 or 27 passes. The problem with your logic is we don't go 3.6+3.6+3.6.I don't feel like crunching the numbers, but what was the run/pass ratio at "the end of the 3rd Q"?
The passing component of the game was a major ingredient to the loss. Fundamentals, discipline, and special teams combined as the other.
The score was 14-10 Iowa at the end of the 1st half. It was still a '3 yds and a cloud of dust' game.
Nebraska averaged 3.6 yards per carry. Not great, but....
3.6 + 3.6 +3.6 = 10.8 yds = 1st down, move the chains, secure the football, do it again. If not, punt it away and rely on the defense who's stats have shown all season to match up well with Iowa. Get the stop and come back with 3.6 + 3.6 + 3.6.
The problem with the passing is it's done at inopportune times. It's 3rd and one, let's try for 13. There's a reason why T.O. got away from it. When the ball is in the air (as opposed to in someones hands) it leads to an increased chance that the wrong person is going to catch it.
I'm not buying this style of offense in the Big 10. There are good days and bad days with it. Never any week-to-week consistency. It's beat yourself football with a lot of "WTF's?"
It was 30 runs to 26 or 27 passes. The problem with your logic is we don't go 3.6+3.6+3.6.
Take a look at our first drive. We ran the ball every down, going 4, 4, 2 (first down, good so far), 2, 4, -3, punt. That's the issue.
Third drive (after TA threw a pick on his first attempt of the game on the second): 2, 4, 10, 1, 2 false starts, and we're at 2nd and 19. Pretty much have to throw it there.
My point is we were committed to the run early in the game, and we weren't moving the ball effectively enough, because we can't count on getting 3 plays of 3.6 yards in order to get a first down and get the drive going. Our WRs are probably the best overall unit on our team. Unfortunately, we don't have a QB that can get them the ball.
I'd be more than open to see some facts to the contrary, but by and large the whole "wearing down the opponents' front 7" thing is a bit of a myth, as I've posted on here several times. I don't have time to look for the thread where I posted it or to redo the analysis, but out of the top 10 rushing teams this year, their YPC goes up by less than half a yard (IIRC it was like .2 YPC) from the first half to the second half, and at that, nearly half of them actually got worse as the game goes on.Meh
Game after game they've abandoned the run as opposed to being patient and wearing down the opponents front 7. They'll take an ugly loss over a boring win.
It's all or nothing with the thought process of this staff and that doesn't bode well for the future.
"Tommy is #2 in the nation in INT's thrown, but cot dammit that's what we want to do so keep at it suckers. As a coaching staff we'll let the players take the heat and poor some more Kool-Aid that next week will be different, next month will be different, next year will be different."
.