- Thread starter
- #41
quoipourquoi
Did Not Fuck Leesha/Sarah
The same can be said for Gretzky after leaving Edmonton, yes? In Edmonton, he never had a minus season (his worst being +15 twice). After leaving Edmonton, he had more minus seasons than plus.
Oh, definitely Edmonton helped Gretzky - particularly by providing him with teammates that could cover for him defensively (Kurri), but with Esposito, he went from a solid, borderline Top 10 offensive talent on the Blackhawks at 25 years-old to becoming the best scoring center in hockey in one year. And then he leaves the Bruins with another 60 Goal, 130 Point season to go to the Rangers, and he immediately falls from Art Ross range back down outside of the top twenty in scoring with a minus-40.
It was a perfect situation for him in Boston, and I think putting him ahead of Clarke might have been generous!
Eddie_Shack said:I don't think we should take Q's list too seriously. It's a who's who of the top fifty players, maybe a little slanted towards the 90s but it's obvious he juggled some things around to ruffle some feathers. It cracked me up. I just want to know, where the hell is Sylvain Lefebvre?
Lefebvre and Eric Messier are #51 and #52 respectively, obviously.
Like I said, everything after number twenty or so is pretty much a dead-heat, because so little separates everyone, so it's not worth taking stock in any of it. And yes, the positioning of Stevens/Brodeur and Coffey/Lidstrom is agenda-based. Do I believe it? Sure, but I know that I'm alone in thinking those things. But the surprise Orr/Tretiak switcheroo? That's pure art!