WiggyRuss
Well-Known Member
there are some disparities though- in that- Gasol's 19 million was done in an era of a 60M or so cap- Thompsons 18 or whatever will be in an era of a 108M cap - OR EVEN HIGHER- the difference between a 1/3 of a payroll and 1/6 of a payroll is obviously huge.I agree. It will also make it difficult to do anything to improve the team going forward. It's like the comparison I used with the Lakers tying up money in longer term deals with older veterans. Example, Pau had a contract that made him virtually untradeable. If teams didn't want to take on Pau's $19 million, they're not going to want to take on Thompson's $18.8 million. The Lakers had to do it though, because they were in a championship window and did what they had to do to win titles. Those titles, make the re-build we're seeing now worth it.
The Cavs have to give Thompson his money because their window is right now. In a couple of years, that window will shrink considerably, if not close entirely (depends on Lebron's health and how quickly he declines) and the contract they are paying Thompson to win now, becomes the anchor keeping them from moving forward. The question will be whether or not they have a title or 2 to make it worth it.
Also- Gasol was old with injury issues - while Thompson is young, never hurt, and still has room to improve.
You can work in a lot more flexibility to Thompsons 1/6th of the cap than to someone like Gasol who had almost 1/3 of the cap- .....while- we have seen- how crippling it is to have OVER 1/3 of your cap in Kobe Bryant when he was not even playing because of how he was run into the ground. ---- or like when Amare was untradeable because not only did his skills precipitously decline- but he was injured all the time AND represented about 1/3 of the cap.
AT least when you have a guy who may be overpaid- but is still healthy, young and useful- you can often time move that kind of guy by attaching assets to him- or taking back a similar deal. And really - that is the best qualifer on how to look at these things to compare- what percentage of the cap tehy constitute.
Over the last couple years 1/6 of the cap would amount to about a 10M dollar contract- which would seem "reasonable" considering the circumstances behind Thompsons anticipated deal. No one would bat an eye of Thompson got 10M a year or almost 1/6 of the cap. -----now- the sticker shock gets you- but 18M to 108 is fairly equivalent to 10 million of 60.