- Thread starter
- #4,021
There's definitely some risk/downside to the Cavs strategy of committing all this money.
Depending on what they do with the Haywood piece... and IF they do anything with Varejoa... it's not nearly as bad as some are making it out to be (Also depends on TT's actual numbers, which is still a ?)
I mean, If you're going to lock in a bunch of players to long term contracts this is THE BEST year to do it.
It would be much worse if Love had gone with a 1 year deal, like most thought he would
The Cavs are doing exactly what they should do. This is their chance and it may never come again. So, they go all in on Lebron and keep their fingers crossed that they can stay healthy long enough to get at least one title. We can debate all day on whether or not they are spending their money on the right pieces, tying up too much money in 1 position, etc. but not on whether or not they should spend what they are spending.
Even if they end up with zero titles in all of this and they end up right back where they were when Lebron is gone, they are still doing the right thing by their fans, imo.