tOfficial 2013 Nebraska Recruiting thread.

[Red_Alert]

Bielema just offered DT Collins.

 

[Brasky]

i'm gonna puke if I hear someone talk about stars again.

 

[Brasky]

Also Nebraska's secondary is going to be much better next year with Jackson/s and cooper on the field. I thought for sure they would put Alonzo Moore in the secondary of course I thought the same thing of Bronson marsh. I still think Marsh should be a Safety he is very athletic hate to see his talent sitting on the bench

 

[iruletheskool]

CJ at safety may just save us

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

i'm gonna puke if I hear someone talk about stars again.

Ye are the one who always said that the recruiting services are accurate for the most part when rating players en sech.....

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Scout has us at #12 right now jjm..


Scout evaluates talent much better in the north

If Rivals and Scout had things reversed ye would be saying just the opposite.

Yer livin in a dream world, stool......a dream world!

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Not to mention, does that mean that Scout evaluates talent much worse in the South?

 

[HuskerPower52]

don't worry about it Brasky its way over your head I'll send you a big box of extra large crayons and some stickers

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Let's face it..........we didn't overachieve, we didn't underachieve......

This is what we've come to expect out of Nebraska. Let's just hope all of our diamonds in the rough can be developed now.

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Nebraska will NEVER have a top 5 class and never has..

Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2005 Team Recruiting Rankings

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Thee bottom line is this.........

You will never be anything as a College Football program, until you can recruit a Defensive Line. Nebraska did a decent job of that in 2012. We tried to do it again this year, just didn't do quite as well as we did in 2012.

The 2012 class was the best class Bo has brought in since he's been here. It should pay dividends over the course of the next few years. Can't wait to see.

 

[Brasky]

Ye are the one who always said that the recruiting services are accurate for the most part when rating players en sech.....

Yeah but nowhere in there did talk about stars.

It's a lot more complicated than that.

The amount of 3 stars they give out..... You can have a huge discrepancy in talent between two 3 star players.

For example, more often than not, a purdue 3 star is not gonna look the same as a Nebraska 3 star

 

[Brasky]

don't worry about it Brasky its way over your head I'll send you a big box of extra large crayons and some stickers

I'm just scared for the people who don't know any better when they read your posts.

 

[Brasky]

Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2005 Team Recruiting Rankings

I lol'd. irule you knew that!!! C'MON MAAAAN!!

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Yeah but nowhere in there did talk about stars.

It's a lot more complicated than that.

The amount of 3 stars they give out..... You can have a huge discrepancy in talent between two 3 star players.

For example, more often than not, a purdue 3 star is not gonna look the same as a Nebraska 3 star

True....

But see the problem is, there can also be quite the discrepancy between a 3-star and a 4-star.....

So while Ohio State is out there pulling in 14 4-star recruits this year, for us to sit here and say that our 3-star recruits have as much potential......well, I'd say that's ridiculous.

 

[Brasky]

I always love posting this because it ends the discussion entirely.

It's pretty friggin black and white guise.

While it's true that Great recruiting classes don't guarantee you National titles, they do guarantee you a chance at one. Conversely in the last 8 years a class average anywhere over 11.5 in the country has guaranteed you WON'T win a national title.



Let's look at the National champs from 2004 to present and their respective recruiting classes that comprised those championship teams using rivals rankings. Rivals began ranking classes in 2002. I'll even add Nebraska's avg class ranking through the same years for comparison.

2004 National Champ: USC
Class rankings:
-'02 - 13th
-'03 - 3rd
-'04 - 1st
Avg Ranking: 5.6 Nebraska's avg: 36.6

2005 National Champ: Texas
Class rankings:
-'02 - 1st
-'03 - 15th
-'04 - 10th
-'05 - 20th
Avg Ranking: 11.5 Nebraska's avg: 28.5


2006 National Champ: Florida
Class Rankings:
-'02 - 20th
-'03 - 2nd
-'04 - 7th
'-05 - 15th
-'06 - 2nd
Avg Ranking: 9.2 Nebraska's Avg: 26.8


2007 National Champ: LSU
Class Rankings:
-'03 - 1st
-'04 - 2nd
-'05 - 22nd
-'06 - 7th
-'07 - 4th
Avg Ranking: 7.2 Nebraska's Avg: 21.4


2008 National Champ: Florida
Class Rankings:
-'04 - 7th
-'05 - 15th
-'06 - 2nd
-'07 - 1st
-'08 - 3rd
Avg Ranking: 5.6 Nebraska's Avg: 19


2009 National Champ: Alabama
Class Rankings:
-'05 - 18th
-'06 - 11th
-'07 - 10th
-'08 - 1st
-'09 - 1st
Avg Ranking: 8.2 Nebraska's Avg: 19.2


2010 National Champ: Auburn
Class Rankings:
-'06 - 10th
-'07 - 7th
-'08 - 20th
-'09 - 19th
-'10 - 4th (including Cam Newton)
Avg Ranking: 8.4 Nebraska's Avg: 22.6


2011 National Champ: Alabama
Class Rankings:
-'07 - 10th
-'08 - 1st
-'09 - 1st
-'10 - 5th
-'11 - 1st
Avg Ranking: 3.6 Nebraska's Avg: 21.6

The average ranking of the classes that made up these National Championship teams is 7.4

Nebraska's avg through these years is 24.4

The numbers speak for themselves. The odds are and have been HUGELY stacked against us winning a national title.

This years team class avg is 24. Right on par with where we've been.

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Rivals doesn't count though !

It's Scout who evaluates our type of talent the most goodest !

 

[Brasky]

2012 final polls -- HuskerMax™

Hmmm what are those averages at the bottom of my stat sheet?

SHOCKING.

 

[iruletheskool]

Dumbasses.. Rivals was the site to use when we recruited more south.. now that were in B1G we need scout/247

Also that 2005 class was downright bad. Idc bout what Rivals ranked it

 

[iruletheskool]

Dumbasses.. Rivals was the site to use when we recruited more south.. now that were in B1G we need scout/247

Also that 2005 class was downright bad. Idc bout what Rivals ranked it