- Thread starter
- #1
averagejoe
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
Playing in 2 title games, but I don't like my matchups in one of them. Plus my opponent has very favorable matchups. I won't give you my entire lineup, but these are the "problems" at some positions:
Problem 1
Looks like I'll be without TE Cameron so I need a fill-in. Here's the "most-added" TE available:
Walker @ Jax
Pitta vs NE
H. Miller @ GB
Paulsen, Ertz and Eifert are all there too.
Problem 2
Fitz. Even if he's cleared to play, do I start him against Seattle's D? I have Edelman (@ BAL) and Crabtree (vs ATL) in reserve. Free agent pool is pretty thin and uninspiring. I actually like Edelman a lot since Gronk went down.
Problem 3
I have the Rams D/ST at home against TB plugged in for now. Very favorable. But I also have the Broncos @ HOU. The Broncos D/ST is not rated as high as the Rams, but my gut says that the Broncos D does better. In this league, it also awards D for total yards allowed. (The less the better obviously.)
Convince me one way or the other. And thanks.
Problem 1
Looks like I'll be without TE Cameron so I need a fill-in. Here's the "most-added" TE available:
Walker @ Jax
Pitta vs NE
H. Miller @ GB
Paulsen, Ertz and Eifert are all there too.
Problem 2
Fitz. Even if he's cleared to play, do I start him against Seattle's D? I have Edelman (@ BAL) and Crabtree (vs ATL) in reserve. Free agent pool is pretty thin and uninspiring. I actually like Edelman a lot since Gronk went down.
Problem 3
I have the Rams D/ST at home against TB plugged in for now. Very favorable. But I also have the Broncos @ HOU. The Broncos D/ST is not rated as high as the Rams, but my gut says that the Broncos D does better. In this league, it also awards D for total yards allowed. (The less the better obviously.)
Convince me one way or the other. And thanks.