you must think this is "real" huh ?
It is real, I've been there and saw douches all over the place just like him.
Is that your fat ass??
yeh, you should LOL. you understand nothing about golf, or photography, apparently.
I have played more golf in a year then you have in your whole life....but yah you're right :rollseyes:
Really? You must play about 4 rounds a day.
I wasn't talking about mini-golf.
I had a conversation with a USGA rules official today about this... It's a very controversial issue.. I don't expect people outside of the game to understand, but its very hard to argue with what happened. Hopefully others get the benefit of the doubt as far as continuing in tourneys moving forward.. That said, I am done with the topic but the hate will continue.
forced perspective, how does it work?
Forced perspective would be a legitimate argument...
...if the camera angle, tigers height, shadow sizes, shadow locations, dying patch of grass size and location, shadow behind dying grass line, divots and many other things were different in one picture or the other.
You could have said photoshopped and been more correct than you were citing perspective.
What does that really show? If anything it shows he is further back because te big brown grass area is closer to his head an the big divot behind him is further down his leg on the second shot. Same with the little circles by his feet
You don't get to place the ball on the ground where the first shot was..........you drop the ball. The ball can roll a foot backwards when you drop it.
Literally based on that picture right there it looks like he is within inches of where he was on the first shot.