Ok? Dallas had two losses by 4 combined points and another when they rested all of their starters. You can't just discount losses because they don't fit the narrative.
I'm not discounting losses . Earlier in they year Atlanta was just ok . The last part of the year they bludgeoned everyone and if it weren't for 1 bad quarter in the SB they'd have bludgeoned NE too . That said this is about the NFC and it was clear at years end Atlanta was the best team in the conference . Same with Carolina in 15. Those are actually 2 of only 5 or 6 years in the last decade where the best team won the conference
It really wasn't clear. Dallas was a consistently very good defensive team all year, but on top of that they averaged 31 PPG over their final 9 games of the year including the playoffs, outside of week 17 when they rested all their starters.
Aren't you on record of calling Dak mediocre?
He wasn't in 2016.
That's pretty short-sighted. Take a look at this site:
The Patriots get to coast while the NFC fights each other.
You would have figured that out if you had the aptitude.
The beauty is the Eagles beat them anyway.
That's a great point. Add Philly to the lucky list
Come on. The game is 60 minutes and in this case longer. Let it go. If you were the better team that day you would have won. One play doesn't decide a game when one team "should" have won. I never realized how whiny Saints fans were until this happened.
Oxymoron?more brees logic
