Other interesting stats of the week:
The ducks converted 54% of 3rd downs in their OOC slate, and went 1-11 on 3rd downs against ASU.
Rosen actually had more yardage than Falk through the air this week (480 v 478) and he threw for 3 TD's, but much of that came after Stanford had the game well in hand and presumably were in more prevent defense.
Falk went 478 and 5TD's, but against a defense that appears to be closer to resembling a FCS squad than a true FBS level.
Outside of Hawaii the Bruins have allowed 150 points in three games. Their defense is ranked as one of the worst in the P5's.
Yeah, I remember them talking about it during the telecast. It really was an astounding turn of events for both teams given where they were coming into the game.ASU's 3rd down defense had been worst in the nation until Saturday. This was in large part to not missing nearly as many tackles as in the first 3 games.
Jon spoke with a couple of schools about their confidence in what Scott is doing in regard with the network... and it appears they are happy with him.
Pac-12 Networks: What the university presidents think
Among things in there, the network is doling out around $2m per team. The SEC and B1G are getting at least $10m each which they admit limits the big budget salaries for coaches some of those conferences are now paying.
And he moved on in his series on the network to opinions from some select media, including his own commentary. Reviews were all over the map from A- to flat out F grades.
Media analysts grade, comment on the Pac-12 Networks
How much of that is truly how they feel, and how much of that is similar to coach speak where you never undermine your players (employee in this case) in public? You aren't going to get a candid response from the schools. It's in their vested interest to blow smoke up his ass and act like everything is going exactly to plan. Undermining him would only make him less effective in negotiations and make things worse.So essentially they are thrilled that he is gambling on ESPN, Fox and CBS to implode and turn Asia and Austrailia into Pac 12 markets? Guess down the road it could makes sense but since so many athletic department are desperate for money since most schools spent what they were led to believe would be the revenue instead of what we ended up getting, seems weird that there was a positive review.
Wow, USC didn't have any explosive plays in their win over Cal. They did have one run that went 19 and one pass play of the same yardage, but no plays over 20. Does that seem uncharateristic to anyone else?
Is Cal's D that good, or just an off day for the deep plays for USC this week?
How much of that is truly how they feel, and how much of that is similar to coach speak where you never undermine your players (employee in this case) in public? You aren't going to get a candid response from the schools. It's in their vested interest to blow smoke up his ass and act like everything is going exactly to plan. Undermining him would only make him less effective in negotiations and make things worse.
But yes, their long term strategy is to leverage these untapped foreign markets and grow their brand until they have the muscle to push Direct TV and other media outlets in this country back to the table.
So, basically we are screwed for the short term and have little hope of catching up with the other conferences in the long term, short of conference realignment.
Yeah, I remember them talking about it during the telecast. It really was an astounding turn of events for both teams given where they were coming into the game.
I do not know how many of those 14 accepted penalties derailed their offense on 3rd downs, but whatever the cause 1-11 is not going to get it done against almost any team in the Pac.
ASU's 3rd down defense had been worst in the nation until Saturday. This was in large part to not missing nearly as many tackles as in the first 3 games.
You didn't watch it?
I would say it was the schemes of the defense, and the pressure...
Plus Cal's Oline look liked throw back linemen, you know the big boys coaches would go pluck off the farm....
Yes.
Hmmmm. Deontay has more receptions, more yards, and more TDs and has come up clutch with games on the line. Is there some other stat we can gauge WRs with?
WSU hasn't even played a road game yet, nor anyone with a pulse. Automatically disqualified from any conference comparative stats.The top receiver in the conference right now actually is a running back.
WSU hasn't even played a road game yet, nor anyone with a pulse. Automatically disqualified from any conference comparative stats.
Not assigning blame, just pointing out the facts.Not our fault the conference is incompetent with their scheduling by allowing Notre Dame to dictate it, and they knew that $C is on our schedule and the Pac 12 won't allow them to come to Pullman in November.
Well, what are the gonna say though?Jon spoke with a couple of schools about their confidence in what Scott is doing in regard with the network... and it appears they are happy with him.
Pac-12 Networks: What the university presidents think
Among things in there, the network is doling out around $2m per team. The SEC and B1G are getting at least $10m each which they admit limits the big budget salaries for coaches some of those conferences are now paying.
And he moved on in his series on the network to opinions from some select media, including his own commentary. Reviews were all over the map from A- to flat out F grades.
Media analysts grade, comment on the Pac-12 Networks