saddles
No More "Bullpen Failure"
If you had to choose one of the two to give a three year contract extension to would it be Beltre or Darvish?
If you had to choose one of the two to give a three year contract extension to would it be Beltre or Darvish?
If you had to choose one of the two to give a three year contract extension to would it be Beltre or Darvish?
If you had to choose one of the two to give a three year contract extension to would it be Beltre or Darvish?
Not sure how long Beltre wants.Darvish, 100%.
I'd be more inclined to try to get Beltre on a 2 year deal with a 3rd year option.
Lol. That wasn't the question though. You cheated.
My bad. I missed where you said Darvish 100%.True! So I'll plead guilty.
OK.........Darvish!
Darvish.If you had to choose one of the two to give a three year contract extension to would it be Beltre or Darvish?
That is just part of the decision making process though. If they were both 26 years old it would be a different question altogether. The answer might not be any different though. I guess you can look at the year we signed Beltre and say the Rangers chose to try and sign Lee first and then moved on to Beltre.The question really isn't posed fairly, in my opinion. Darvish is many years younger and plays a more coveted position.
If you had to choose one of the two to give a three year contract extension to would it be Beltre or Darvish?
What do you think it would take to sign them? Do you think Beltre will take less AAV than he is due in 2016? Maybe we should look at how much more per year Darvish is worth than Adrian? There are definitely a lot of factors to consider.Who would I rather sign to an extension? Darvish.
Who do I think would actually sign an extension? Beltre.
I wonder if he would agree to a three year extension now. If he has a great season in 2016 I am pretty sure he wouldn't extend for just 3 years a year from now. We would take on a great deal more risk doing it this spring versus waiting and he takes on more risk by waiting. Of course he may have all the confidence in the world about his ability to recover and not feel it is risky at all to wait until later.That's easy... Darvish. I love Beltre, but he is at the tail end of his career. Not to mention, if you could talk Darvish into an extension of only 3 years, that would be great. I would think he would require more time.
I wonder if he would agree to a three year extension now. If he has a great season in 2016 I am pretty sure he wouldn't extend for just 3 years a year from now. We would take on a great deal more risk doing it this spring versus waiting and he takes on more risk by waiting. Of course he may have all the confidence in the world about his ability to recover and not feel it is risky at all to wait until later.
Then again, I am not sure if the organization is interested in keeping him around when he is certain to make over $20 million per year. I am not sure how they view him as a possible long term option beyond 2017.
I am pretty confident as well. That being so I wouldn't mind them offering him something now. I don't believe there is any chance they even consider it though. I think any realistic chance of them trying to negotiate an extension would have to take place after this season.Business wise, it probably is dumb for both Yu or the Rangers to make a deal this spring - lot's of unknowns. That's why I don't think anything will happen here. Rangers would probably get the best deal at this point though. Overall, I actually think the opposite, I think Yu would have the most to lose by signing now because he isn't going to get the best offer coming off of a major surgery. I say this as I am pretty confident he going to get back to his dominate form.