Texas Rangers trade rumors: Alejandro De Aza possible Rangers target
I would think Murphy would be the best fit of the 3 names mentioned. De Aza would make almost $6 million and would cost some minor leaguers as well. Venable couldn't hit at all here last year.
Love seeing DDJ and Odor in camp early. I get the impression from Roogie that he wants to be a leader when it's his time.
Both are showing leader attitudes and qualities. Really nice to see.
Texas Rangers trade rumors: Alejandro De Aza possible Rangers target
I would think Murphy would be the best fit of the 3 names mentioned. De Aza would make almost $6 million and would cost some minor leaguers as well. Venable couldn't hit at all here last year.
I really doubt those guys make the club out of ST. I would imagine they would wade through Hamilton, Ruggiano, Rua and one of those guys mentioned above(Murphy et al.) before they would entertain the possibility of bringing one of the prospects up before mid-May or June or even later. They might even try Ike Davis and the kid Kivlehan they got from Seattle before Mazara, Gallo or Brinson get called up.
So he will likely play 58
Ranking the teams: 18 through 13
David Schoenfield has the Rangers at #14. He isn't sold on our rotation.
I think--well you know what I think.
His prediction is 83-79.
Well, to be fair, Elvis did show up early as well if that is what we are going on to show leadership.It sure is. Now, if we can get EA to follow-suit, we may just be on to something.
I think you hit the nail squarely on the head.David Schoenfield is one of the biggest idiots at ESPN, and that's saying a lot. Just one look at his picture tells you he's a stat geek who's never even thrown a baseball in his life. His predictions and rankings are always way off (probably why ESPN keeps him around).
He has the Astros at #3 overall and the best team in the AL. He says that if they stay healthy, they will "run away with the division". He projects regression for several Rangers (which is a fair argument), but he fails to predict any regression for career nobodies like Luis Valbuena and Colby Rasmus (talk about playing WAY over their heads last year!). He says they had a great offseason- adding Doug Fister and Ken Giles while losing Chris Carter, Jed Lowrie, Hank Conger, Vincent Velasquez, Brett Oberholtzer, and Scott Kazmir is supposedly great I guess. And he says that Martin Perez and Derek Holland were never really all that great while gushing over Colin McHugh (mediocre) and Lance McCullers.
Basically he pointed out all the ways that the Rangers could fail, yet made every excuse possible for the Astros (things like "he was good if you don't count the first half" or "their bullpen was solid if you ignore the playoffs"). Essentially, he went into these rankings with his mind already made up and then just twisted his narratives and ignored facts on every team to support his rankings. He's an idiot.