- Thread starter
- #1
I'll check it out, but if there is no safety like the rest of their products then I am out.
You mean the one where it won't fire unless the trigger is pulled? All makers have that one. "Don't pull the trigger and it won't fire" is not a safety.Glocks have 3 safety's
It's almost exactly the same size as a Glock 26 which I'm good with out to 30 yards. Only difference is the width. And I'm sure you'll be able to buy aftermarket base plates for the magazines which extend the grip, which is what I did for all my 26 magazines. So if you were considering one but didn't like those two particular characteristics, I would still go try one out.I will not. I like the slimness of these pistols but the grip length and barrel length are just too short to be effective for much more than bad breath distances.
I want a Shield and a 43... I want them all!I wouldn't mind holding one but I'm still in love with my Shield 9mm. Also have a PF9 as a backup so I don't really need one.... however, that's never stopped me before.![]()
I like buying multiples of the same exact gun. But I'm not a collector. Right now I only own two handguns and they are identical CZ P-07 in 9mm. I may even add a third.I've got a Glock 19 and it's a nice gun but it will probably be the only Glock and 9mm I will ever own. I just don't see the point in having multiple guns of the same caliber if I am going to spend my money I want something new and different.
It's almost exactly the same size as a Glock 26 which I'm good with out to 30 yards. Only difference is the width. And I'm sure you'll be able to buy aftermarket base plates for the magazines which extend the grip, which is what I did for all my 26 magazines. So if you were considering one but didn't like those two particular characteristics, I would still go try one out.
My use of bad breath distances was an over-exaggeration on my part. The first gun a logged significant time on was a Glock 27 and I learned to shoot it well enough. But no matter how good I can get with a smaller gun I can get a good bit better with a slightly larger one without giving up much in the way of concealability. The length of the barrel (as long as it's under 5") to me, has very, very little to do with how well a gun conceals. So I see no point in owning anything smaller than a 4" barrel (within reason of course, my P-07 isn't quite 4" but it's pretty close at 3.87"). I would have some interest in something like the XDS-9 4" if something like that were made in a gun that I had interest in.It's almost exactly the same size as a Glock 26 which I'm good with out to 30 yards. Only difference is the width. And I'm sure you'll be able to buy aftermarket base plates for the magazines which extend the grip, which is what I did for all my 26 magazines. So if you were considering one but didn't like those two particular characteristics, I would still go try one out.
I hear ya. Height and width are definitely the top two priority factors for me when considering concealability. The 26 is a bit thick but not sure I would want to give up the capacity of switching to the 43. Still I want to shoot one and would definitely consider buying one.My use of bad breath distances was an over-exaggeration on my part. The first gun a logged significant time on was a Glock 27 and I learned to shoot it well enough. But no matter how good I can get with a smaller gun I can get a good bit better with a slightly larger one without giving up much in the way of concealability. The length of the barrel (as long as it's under 5") to me, has very, very little to do with how well a gun conceals. So I see no point in owning anything smaller than a 4" barrel (within reason of course, my P-07 isn't quite 4" but it's pretty close at 3.87"). I would have some interest in something like the XDS-9 4" if something like that were made in a gun that I had interest in.