- Thread starter
- #1
Washington Redskins Should Ditch Mike Shanahan but Keep 3-4 Defense | Bleacher Report
again BR is typically foolish but the article here makes sense
again BR is typically foolish but the article here makes sense
Who do we have to play the LB positions in the 4-3 exactly?
Please don't say Rob Jackson because he's more of a DE than RAK.
Half the defense is either FA or suspect starters to begin with. New coach, new system... zero reason to stick with a 3-4 that has been horrid. Aside from Rak and Kerigan (who are both suspect in coverage by the way) exactly how many 3-4 LBs do we actually have??
zero reason to stick with the haslett version of the 3-4
now if you went 4-3 then tapp and jackson are better candidates for the de job then Rak who has never been a pro de
we dont have the people for the 4-3 eitherSo keep him as an OLB in our 4-3. We still dont have the rest of the personnel currently on roster to run a 3-4. Rak had his best year as an OLB in the 4-3. Kerigan can transition to DE, right now we could go either way, but we are gertting zero pressure from our 3-4 so whats the point in sticking with it?
Half the defense is either FA or suspect starters to begin with. New coach, new system... zero reason to stick with a 3-4 that has been horrid. Aside from Rak and Kerigan (who are both suspect in coverage by the way) exactly how many 3-4 LBs do we actually have??
I hear people saying Cofield isn't a good NT but the performance reviews have not supported this statement.