- Thread starter
- #4,441
Bandit
RIP to the real Bandit
I mean it all depends on your perspective because last year he traded a future 1st for Chuba Hubbard and a future 2nd for Tommy Tremble so by those standards this was a steal for him.
Hey he traded it to my brother last year.Yup saw it . I really wish the teams that are likely to have early first round picks would quit trading them to you, no offense mean Bandit.
That was at 10am on a Sunday and he initiated that trade too. Maybe he makes better decisions after he’s been drinking.Hey he traded it to my brother last year.
Well it ain't that Gallup and Gordon aren't worth a first, he got good value for a future #1...the issue is, it's a win now move, and he doesn’t have a win now roster. The silly shitI mean it all depends on your perspective because last year he traded a future 1st for Chuba Hubbard and a future 2nd for Tommy Tremble so by those standards this was a steal for him.
Yes I agree with that totally.Well it ain't that Gallup and Gordon aren't worth a first, he got good value for a future #1...the issue is, it's a win now move, and he doesn’t have a win now roster. The silly shit
Well it ain't that Gallup and Gordon aren't worth a first, he got good value for a future #1...the issue is, it's a win now move, and he doesn’t have a win now roster. The silly shit
Yes I agree with this.Yes I agree with that totally.
well if Taylor goes down, that's a huge vacuum..one i highly doubt is filled by one, nor is very productive as Taylor is a bit of a unicorn, and Matty Ice/Pittman don't exactly strike fear into any DC's...but regardless, extensive opportunity exists should that every happen@Clemson74 - certainly covering all the bases in that Indy backfield. .....
None of them will be as good as Taylor, but the offensive line is decent enough to get at least some moderate productivity out of someone if I have to use them for a week or two. Any longer than that I’m probably screwed anyway.well if Taylor goes down, that's a huge vacuum..one i highly doubt is filled by one, nor is very productive as Taylor is a bit of a unicorn, and Matty Ice/Pittman don't exactly strike fear into any DC's...but regardless, extensive opportunity exists should that every happen
Looked - mine seems ok although I could've picked better weeks for a couple of opponents. .....Did the schedule last night. Feel free to check it if you'd like.
I don't think you're going to get any sympathy from any of us that are in the division of death.Looked - mine seems ok although I could've picked better weeks for a couple of opponents. .....
He's a running back so it doesn't surprise me. You can never have too many of them. Now I would have taken Pierce over Spiller, but it's not like either are a slam dunk. He also had the 1.4 and took London so he probably wanted to get a running back and a wide receiver with those two picks. I mean there's certainly no guarantee on anybody in this class producing, so the rookie drafts I've been a part of have been all over of the place this year more than any other year. And not all of us share your affinity for wide receivers.View attachment 298638
still blows my mind that a 4th round RB went 1.05 in our draft, initiating my trade offer to @TREFF for picks 1.06/1.08.
still blows my mind that a 4th round RB went 1.05 in our draft, initiating my trade offer to @TREFF for picks 1.06/1.08.
@SmokingMonkey - It was an interesting draft to watch early since I didn't pick until the 3rd. ..... funny I ended up with exactly who I wanted with those picks (Bell, McBride). ... thought they'd be long gone by then. ....
---------------------
As for the recent trade, I shopped Davis pretty hard in several package deals but settled for what I could get from a tough choice potential cut - tough crowd. For Fuzzy needed bench depth - for me a pick I will need to get very lucky with to maintain value.