fightinfunbags
Well-Known Member
Yeah, Shai needs more VORP.A better take from thunder would be 'yeah I know it's probably gonna be Jokic but weird things can happen so maybe a small chance'.
Yeah, Shai needs more VORP.A better take from thunder would be 'yeah I know it's probably gonna be Jokic but weird things can happen so maybe a small chance'.
You need new materialYeah, Shai needs more VORP.
QUOTE="msgkings322, post: 17898139, member: 587"]
A better take from thunder would be 'yeah I know it's probably gonna be Jokic but weird things can happen so maybe a small chance'.
You need to lick my fucking ballsYou need new material
What I will say is if Thunder are the #1 seed then SGA should be MVP. I already made my case for SGA a few weeks ago so I won't repeat myself but yeah if they end up with a better record/#1 seed out West then give it to him
That escalated quickly. And I’m reaping all the benefits!You need to lick my fucking balls
I don’t speak for Shaq, he told everyone who to vote for. Hey, I can hold out hope. I know it’s 90 percent Jokic is going to win, but the way these voters twist in the wind let’s see what blows the rest of the way.thunder you are one of the OGs here, and a very astute basketball fan and close follower of the NBA. I get repping your team but why do you have takes like this that are obviously not correct? You aren't some idiot casual OKC homer, you know damn well it's gonna be Joker again. What gives?
Love seeing Sabonis and Brunson thereMy current MVP top 5 would look like this
1) SGA
2) Jokic
3) Luka
4) Sabonis
5) Brunson
Unfortunately, your guy has no chance because he isn’t an analytics darling.I don’t speak for Shaq, he told everyone who to vote for. Hey, I can hold out hope. I know it’s 90 percent Jokic is going to win, but the way these voters twist in the wind let’s see what blows the rest of the way.
Yup all he is doing is putting up numbers comparable or better than Jordan and Lebron when they won their first MVPs.Unfortunately, your guy has no chance because he isn’t an analytics darling.
The new rules: Shai has to average 8-10 RPG if he wants to win MVPs now. That’s how you have to juke the analytics. In that world they give a Big 1.8 points for the same assist Shai gets 1 point for. The other side is Shai gets 1.7/1.8 points for every rebound he gets because he’s a guard. This is what happens when you invite math fags to determine shit that matters in pro sports.Yup all he is doing is putting up numbers comparable or better than Jordan and Lebron when they won their first MVPs.
Looking at OKC remaining schedule, they're likely going to end up with 56-58 wins in a year they were projected to win 44ish games.
If you don't give it to SGA this year then when will he ever get this award? Him repeating the same year next season while OKC goes 54-28 as a 3 seed won't get him shit. This should be his year but it won't be
Jokic hasn’t even been as good as past Jokic this year.Story shouldn’t matter
He’s simply not as good as jokic this year
Jokic hasn’t even been as good as past Jokic this year.
“Something big” - voters stop leaning exclusively on math formulas to determine shit in sports.And?
It’s a single season award
It’s you against the field
Joker still laps the field in a “down” year
Much like when Mike trout only lost mvps when Cabrera did something historic like a triple crown, it will take something big to knock jokic down
Problem with mvp voters is they pick and choose when to focus on the word valuable which leads to lazy votingLove seeing Sabonis and Brunson there
“Something big” - voters stop leaning exclusively on math formulas to determine shit in sports.