NDHoosier101
Reigning "Last to post" Champion
Nice facts. However, just because you're a better bad teams doesn't change the fact that you are in fact a bad team. Which was my original point.
Nice facts. However, just because you're a better bad teams doesn't change the fact that you are in fact a bad team. Which was my original point.
Arkansas State is one of the best non automatic qualifying teams the past season and will be one of the best this year. The Sun Belt was one of the better non aq conferemces last year. Maybe pay attention before throwing out stupid statements when you are oblivious.
Arkansas State is one of the best non automatic qualifying teams the past season and will be one of the best this year. The Sun Belt was one of the better non aq conferemces last year. Maybe pay attention before throwing out stupid statements when you are oblivious.
No, no aq teams other than Boise State and TCU have consistently beaten big schools. So if that is your arguement, it is a pretty stupid one. Last year a solid San Diego State team lost to ULL (Sun Belt). For you to expect teams other than the ones that have been picked up by bigger comferences to consistently beat the bigger schools than you are in dream land. It isn't polishing a turd, it is point blank the best of the rest. They may pull off an upsett every 5 years or so, but even then things will have to go near perfect. As far as playing a smaller school, better Arky State than a FCS school.
And why are you hating on mid-majors? They are Notre Dames brotherin. Shouldn't you of all people have respect for them?
Are you actually sure about what we're arguing? Your paragraph goes all over the place. My argument is all the non aqs not already joining an aq conference this year are second rate football teams that are easy pickings for big time programs. Upsets happen, but when bigger schools choose any mid major they are expected to and a huge percentage of the time do whip up on them. Whether you play arky st or new Mexico, neither of those teams are playing with a full deck of cards. So, theyre all bad but you can try to present a positive twist all you want.
believe it or not there is a major difference between the two
Arkansas State is a team with talent, while they don't completely have enough to beat a top team that's focused, if you're not focused they will beat you. Meanwhile New Mexico on the other hand you could sleepwalk and still beat them 42-0.
i hope this doesn't bite me in the ass but i would like to save this comment for when Nebraska beats them this year and everyone says that they are shitty competition.
believe it or not there is a major difference between the two
Arkansas State is a team with talent, while they don't completely have enough to beat a top team that's focused, if you're not focused they will beat you. Meanwhile New Mexico on the other hand you could sleepwalk and still beat them 42-0.