The Derski
No Fat Chicks
Putting one up every day until Saturday. BTFD
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DYje57V_BY]It's funny 'cause it's true - YouTube[/ame]
Putting one up every day until Saturday. BTFD
ASU -12.5
You know why I find this number interesting? Because it's empirical proof that the logic "anything can happen in a rivalry game" is false. You see, if you believe the above statement, you then attribute a 50-50 probability to the outcome of the game. An economist would look at this scenario and say, that's an arbitrage opportunity and that any savvy individual would bet the house on Arizona to cover and more times than not they'll win and quickly grow rich. We know that's not the case however because we rarely see this happen. Therefore the fact must remain that their are favorites in rivalry games and underdogs.. Or we'd all be rich.
Do you want to know what the line for the Oregon game was?
No THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BUT CAN YOU TELL ME IF DENKER WAS A WHITE MICHAEL VICK VS OREGON?
Denker has been a white Mike Vick his whole life son. Minus the dogs.
You know why I find this number interesting? Because it's empirical proof that the logic "anything can happen in a rivalry game" is false. You see, if you believe the above statement, you then attribute a 50-50 probability to the outcome of the game. An economist would look at this scenario and say, that's an arbitrage opportunity and that any savvy individual would bet the house on Arizona to cover and more times than not they'll win and quickly grow rich. We know that's not the case however because we rarely see this happen. Therefore the fact must remain that their are favorites in rivalry games and underdogs.. Or we'd all be rich.
Clean, fresh update on Grice anybody? I do not trust DJ to take the helm.
Hahaha you're still on this?! Move on bro! You're trying waaaaaaay too hard to sound intelligent in your comment. Did you just learn that in your freshman Econ class today? That's cute, I remember those days too. You obviously haven't watched enough rivalry games, especially the last few, or else you wouldn't be saying this.
Hahaha you're still on this?! Move on bro! You're trying waaaaaaay too hard to sound intelligent in your comment. Did you just learn that in your freshman Econ class today? That's cute, I remember those days too. You obviously haven't watched enough rivalry games, especially the last few, or else you wouldn't be saying this.
Do you want to know what the line for the Oregon game was?
WhoDat... Predictors are less relevant when it comes to rivalry games, because of the heightened emotional states of 18-22 year olds. Weird things happen when adrenaline levels are increased. The reason why statements like "anything goes in rivalries" prove to be true more often than not is because there is factual evidence to back them up. (ie: look at the last 5 years of the Territorial Cup and see how many of those games were won by the underdog)
For instance, asu sports get a lot of grief for their lower academic standards. This statement can be backed up by the fact that the asu football team is 11th in the pac12 at placing players on the All-Conference academic team. (UofA is 3rd)... which again is a fact that can be used to back up the statement: "you don't have to be smart to play good football".
Jeff Van Raphorst use to choke vs Uofa. Willie Tuitama and his garbage performances vs Asu. Its all adrenaline, pressure, and emotions.