- Thread starter
- #21
lionstop1
Top Notch
Looking back at some of the pre-draft visits, there is plenty of evidence that says that these visits may mean there is a real interest in the players.
Lots of guys. I'm sure teams hope and wish they can start, but they don't. Mingo, the kid Miami took at 3...neither started or played much last year. Maybe Mingo did later on. The kid from Miami looks like a bust. The CB Oakland took never started. They traded out of the top 10 for him but they were gonna take him at 3 anyways.
It makes sense to draft BPA if you have a roster like the Raiders or Jacksonville and need help everywhere. If you are a playoff type team with just a few holes, it is foolish not to target certain positions that you are weak at and need to get over the hump. Whether that be trading up or down to target the position.
Whooooooo. Mr thunda. Are you now saying the bpa approach was right for Lions during the sackus debacle on CBS Era? Because holy fuck I think you were going ape shit over that back then. And yes we were El terrible.
Sometimes I sit up at night and thank my lucky stars Al Davis was incompetent.THANK YOU AGAIN OAKLAND, for taking JaMarcus Russell and not Megatron.
It's a gray area and yes Suh has been better than Okung so far but Okung is still a damn good player and plays a much more important position than Suh. We had just drafted our franchise QB. Position value also has to be factored in than just "BPA". QB-LT-DE/OLB-WR-CB are the 5 most important and is the reason you always see those positions get selected top ten more often, year in and year out.
FIFYI am just fucking with you. That whole sackus blokung stuff was anoying.
Personally, I think there is a complete misconception when it comes to fans and their overall thoughts about how NFL teams want to build their teams. To me, its talent over need in so many cases, that teams covet and they attempt to add needs whenever possible. There is no one script that every team follows, they are all a bit different but they all want the most talented guys. This brings me to this:
Today, I saw that the Broncos were showing tons of intererest in Kelvin Benjamin at his pro-day and most fans would probably see that and wonder why. The Broncos are set on offense, right? Maybe, but does that mean they pass on a guy like Benjamin if he is high on their draft board? Absolutely not.
Then, I saw where the Lions are hosting Eric Ebron for a visit. I wonder how Lions fans feel about this, considering that most believe the Lions should be done with offense because they have the best WR in the game, a new #2 and Pettigrew is back. Some would probably say that bring Ebron in is some type of smoke screen of some sort but I doubt it. Its because Ebron is the top TE and could cause a lot of problems.
To add, Mayhew and Caldwell were also at the Florida St pro-day and the word is that they were there scoping out the defensive players, which may be true but Im sure they took some notes on Benjamin.
Talent trumps need, especially early in the draft.
As far as bringing in Ebron -- I think it is a total smokescreen. I would wager they scheduled the visit before they re-signed Pettigrew and still brought him with the off chance, one of the teams may be enamored with him and Detroit could trade back in the 1st round.
As much as I doubt our front office at times -- I don't see a single scenario playing out where they would draft Ebron, when they already have Pettigrew signed, as well as Fauria and Mike Williams.
If Ebron was the Lions target -- Pettigrew would be a NYJ right now.
My guess is that they showed interest in ebron to scare pettigrew into signing a decent contract.
Ebron is an upgrade over the TEs the Lions have. I doubt its a scare tactic.
I don't know.....we've talked a lot about Evans being an option around here. Ebron is faster.
"Due diligence" is exactly what I'm talking about. Im not really saying that Ebron is the target, just an option. Some teams dont even bring in all 30 guys for their visits, so my guess is that the guys that they do bring in, its for a reason.