- Thread starter
- #1
skinsdad62
US ARMY retired /mod.
Why has Washington's special teams been so bad? | Comcast SportsNet Washington
look at those crap rankings
all about depth
look at those crap rankings
all about depth
Thanks for starting this thread Dad. ST has been nothing short of embarrassing for the last few years and it needs to stop. They've changed coaches, they've changed players, and yet nothing helped. It's time for a change.
Everyone wants to dump Forbath because of his short kicks. My position has always been lets keep the guy who can make field goals, something we have been missing since Chip Loemiller, and just cover the damn kick. It wasn't that long ago that teams returned nearly every kick and maybe broke 1-2 for an entire year. So covering kicks can be done.
So Forbath misses from 50 and struggles in the first week of camp and everyone wants him replaced. It's amazing to me how much hate this guy gets considering the horrible kickers we have been trotting out there for the last 2 decades.
I like Cobra as well.
17/18 = 94.4% accuracy rate in 2012/FGs
18/22 = 81.8% accuracy rate in 2013/FGs
24/27 = 88.8% accuracy rate in 2014/FGs
Overall
59/67 = 88.0% accuracy rate
From the accuracy rates, 2012 and 2014 were damn good/arguably great even and 2013 was good.
Its somewhat troubling to me though that in 67 attempts Cobra has no makes from 50+ yards.
Why it's....it's...it's as if John Hall has returned.
(Inside joke)
Edit: I checked and according to the ESPN stats he's 2-4 from 50+ as a Redskin. He's also a a damned good 22-25 from 40-49.
Kai Forbath Stats - Washington Redskins - ESPN
Heh. I almost made a J Hall reference myself. Good grief that was a clusterfuck of a couple seasons back then.
short and low kickoffs hamper kickoff coverage that is a fact. In todays nfl all kickoffs should be touchbacks, especially in domed stadiums. I believe its a huge disadvantage that we don't have a kicker that consistently gets touchbacks.
As opposed to the clusterfuck of the last couple of seasons?
short and low kickoffs hamper kickoff coverage that is a fact. In todays nfl all kickoffs should be touchbacks, especially in domed stadiums. I believe its a huge disadvantage that we don't have a kicker that consistently gets touchbacks.
I should've clarified. I was referring specifically to Hall, Hall injuring himself......twice in one season, and in multiple seasons, Gibbs nonsensical decisions to stay with Hall as long as he did, keeping him on the roster etc and last, but by no means least. The Hall/Davekn partnership and the love that dare not speak its name that Davekn had for Hall.
Hall - 2004 missed 8 games due to injury
Hall - 2005 missed 6 games due to injury
Hall - 2006 finally gets cut and was hurt 5 games into the season
Oh I totally get what Dean is saying, we are one of the few teams that can't count on setting up our defense on the 20 every kickoff.
DGF said:The problem is finding that guy and also making sure he is good enough on FGs to actually have a kickoff to defend. We've probably had 25 kickers the last few decades and not one of them could do both so I'm keeping the guy who actually makes kicks, and big kicks by the way, over the big leg who is wide left from 38.
No team in the NFL can depend on that.
There was at least one, Graham Gano.
Last year he was 5th in the NFL far as distance on his kick offs.
Of his 79 KOs, 61, or 77% were touch-backs which percentage-wise was easily best in the league for TBs.
FG-wise for the last 3 years for the Panthers, Gano's been 9/11 - 81.8%, 24/27 - 88.8%, and 29/35 - 82.8%