Something or Nothing?

[bksballer89]

Does it mean anything that the Rockets won both games against the Spurs considering both games were played in San Antonio?

 

[BOTSLAYER]

Ultimately it means I am a genius as I called this a month ago*. They have not beat a team with a better than 63% record. (PHO is 63% and HOU is 63.3%). I would also say that HOU is considerably stronger than PHO.



*Really it means that Pop is limiting his starters minutes (mostly Duncan) regardless of who they are playing and that is not going to be good enough to beat anybody in the playoffs. Identical to what I have been saying since their first thread I posted revealing their winning by committee. They will need a 4+ seed to move past the 1st round and they are not going to the WCF.

 

[BOTSLAYER]

You could add that it makes them very consistent. If they are better than you are they are going to beat you regardless of where they are playing and if not they are going to lose.

 

[LAKERSUSCBAM]

You could add that it makes them very consistent. If they are better than you are they are going to beat you regardless of where they are playing and if not they are going to lose.

then tell us why the Lakers went into Houston and beat them? Does them make them better than the Rockets based on your logic?

 

[BOTSLAYER]

then tell us why the Lakers went into Houston and beat them? Does them make them better than the Rockets based on your logic?

I thought it was pretty clear I was referring to the Spurs.

 

[wildturkey]

*looks at calender*

Still December

Yep. It's nothing. Get back to me in March

 

[bksballer89]

They only have one meaningful meeting left which is next month. The final meeting is in late April which mean the starters for both teams will be in a suit or play limited minutes

 

[BOTSLAYER]

Going to go ahead and bump this for my own genius, even on a back to back they beat the team under .630