Schmoopy1000
When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
"Trade Amari Cooper for Jordan Love"
"Trade Amari Cooper for Jordan Love"
Trading Coop isn't dumb. Trading Coop for Love is idiotic. I understand a GB Fan wanting that trade though.The Cowboys aren't going anywhere with Cooper so why is it a stupid statement?
I wouldn't call $20Mt cheap for Cooper because he just isn't on the same level as some other elite WRs, but let's say for this scenario he is. It's not just paying him $20M, it's $20M PLUS a #1. It's one thing to give a FA WR $20M, it's another to trade a #1 pick and then also pay a huge contract. Now technically a team that trades for him could in theory get off cheap by getting him for half of his $10M salary this year and $20M next year and then cut him with no dead money. But would you give up a #1 for a year and a half of a guy and $20M next year?while you might be right.
20 mil for a #1 will be cheap going forward.
but like you said. they dont need a #1.
well I agree with you that is wont happen, but I would jump at it if it was offered.I wouldn't call $20Mt cheap for Cooper because he just isn't on the same level as some other elite WRs, but let's say for this scenario he is. It's not just paying him $20M, it's $20M PLUS a #1. It's one thing to give a FA WR $20M, it's another to trade a #1 pick and then also pay a huge contract. Now technically a team that trades for him could in theory get off cheap by getting him for half of his $10M salary this year and $20M next year and then cut him with no dead money. But would you give up a #1 for a year and a half of a guy and $20M next year?
Yeah, me too. Hey, you never know rightwell I agree with you that is wont happen, but I would jump at it if it was offered.
& no I would take the 1st over Love LOL
Well if Sam Bradford can be traded for a 1st how many times? LOLYeah, me too. Hey, you never know right
I know we gave up a 1, but I'd take a 2 for Coop. It gives cap relief and with Lamb, Gallup and Wilson Dallas is still stacked at WR.I wouldn't call $20Mt cheap for Cooper because he just isn't on the same level as some other elite WRs, but let's say for this scenario he is. It's not just paying him $20M, it's $20M PLUS a #1. It's one thing to give a FA WR $20M, it's another to trade a #1 pick and then also pay a huge contract. Now technically a team that trades for him could in theory get off cheap by getting him for half of his $10M salary this year and $20M next year and then cut him with no dead money. But would you give up a #1 for a year and a half of a guy and $20M next year?
if it is a 2.I know we gave up a 1, but I'd take a 2 for Coop. It gives cap relief and with Lamb, Gallup and Wilson Dallas is still stacked at WR.
Or a bottle of tobascoCan they get a used dirty jock for Mike Nolan? I would take it in a heartbeat
So you want a team to over pay for Nolan.Can they get a used dirty jock for Mike Nolan? I would take it in a heartbeat
you should use green font on 50% of your posts then...that would help you greatly around hereI was just being sarcastic. I should have used the green font.
offends me? You're giving yourself way too much credit, I've always enjoyed a good circus act.I'll post whatever I want and if it offends you then it is worth it.
The fact is you respond in a butt-hurt way to most of my posts and if I trigger you then my job is done.offends me? You're giving yourself way too much credit, I've always enjoyed a good circus act.
I see these articles about potential trade of Gallup to Packers for 2nd or 3rd round pick. This would be stupid as hell.