So what's worse: losing a series at full strength or losing a series without your biggest and most important star?

[msgkings322]

First off not losing is of course better than both.

If you're full strength and lose you at least get to see the best version of your team and you're competitive and have some hope

If your best guy is out you know your chances are basically shot so you stress less and you can always think 'well at full strength we had it'

I think in the end on principle you should always prefer less injuries to more...the injury thing just gives you a comforting silver lining with the loss

 

[tlance]

First off not losing is of course better than both.

If you're full strength and lose you at least get to see the best version of your team and you're competitive and have some hope

If your best guy is out you know your chances are basically shot so you stress less and you can always think 'well at full strength we had it'

I think in the end on principle you should always prefer less injuries to more...the injury thing just gives you a comforting silver lining with the loss

Losing at full strength is better.

You see what you have.

I really hate the latest trend of “well, you lost. Time to blow it up!” For teams that are theoretically close, but come up short.

Building a winning core takes time in the NBA. Very few teams break through on their 2nd or 3rd chance.