BucksFanInGA
Well-Known Member
The Cfb landscape is just changing.
B1G hasn't had a 1st round QB drafted in 19 years.
They are 8-29 vs ranked ooc opponents over last 4 seasons.
worst metric ever... just.. wow...
The Cfb landscape is just changing.
B1G hasn't had a 1st round QB drafted in 19 years.
They are 8-29 vs ranked ooc opponents over last 4 seasons.
worst metric ever... just.. wow...
The Cfb landscape is just changing.
B1G hasn't had a 1st round QB drafted in 19 years.
They are 8-29 vs ranked ooc opponents over last 4 seasons.
There are a couple of things going on here. First, it's the media doing what the media does. They overreact to everything, every week. We're 2 weeks in, USC has a blowout win over a Fresno team that doesn't appear to be anything close to the pain in the ass Fresno teams of the past and a lucky win over Stanford (still don't know how we won that game), we are literally a couple of injuries or another fake drowning nephew away from disaster, yet I heard talking heads saying "USC is back". The B1G had a rough weekend, so of course, the media is sounding the conferences death knell.
Also, the B1G has dug itself a little bit of a hole because the teams that were considered the one's most likely to make the playoff have a loss. This would be the case even without a playoff. However, there is the old cfb saying that "it's better to lose early than lose late". If tOSU, MSU or Wiscy manage to win out, they will likely be solidly in the playoff discussion.
Yep, and it will obviously never change again, right?
You gotta quit with this common sense stuff TF12.
It's a good point he made. But he also is lending no thought to the landscape of not only modern cfb but our society in general.
And yes, it plays a roll.
Dude, chill. The committee hasn't said a word one.
The reality is your conference's flag bearers got beat.
What else are the pollsters and or committee members supposed to go off of but ooc performances when deciding on a b1g team vs the other 4 conferences?
Do you really not see this?
Wisky, defeated by LSU
MSU defeated by 19 to Oregon
Ohio defeated by 14 @ home to VT
Not to mention the lackluster performances by the next group of b1g teams.
Like TB said, did anyone think after week 2 Auburn would be playing for the Natty?
How is this a typical B1G drama queen thread? Is the season young still or does 2 weeks predict the entire season? In 2009 Iowa almost lost to an FCS school the first game of the season and almost ran the table that year if it weren't for a QB injury. That's my point and I don't give a fuck about the losses by tOSU, UM, MSU and Wisky. Like TB said, did anyone think after week 2 Auburn would be playing for the Natty?
After week 2 Auburn was 2-0 and controlled their own destiny.
How so ?
How is this a typical B1G drama queen thread? Is the season young still or does 2 weeks predict the entire season? In 2009 Iowa almost lost to an FCS school the first game of the season and almost ran the table that year if it weren't for a QB injury. That's my point and I don't give a fuck about the losses by tOSU, UM, MSU and Wisky. Like TB said, did anyone think after week 2 Auburn would be playing for the Natty?
Also tf12 is right about medias roll in the panic button approach.
But thinking long term viability is more my angle.
It is what is, and has been trending that way for years.
ND, Michigan, Ohio.
Just look at the results totals when they play out west or south teams.
Ya, they get a a W once in a while, but often get their doors blown off.