logic
Well-Known Member
The "money" excuse is the biggest beaten-to-death cop-out excuse of them all.
This is just simply naive.
Who votes on the format change? What is their primary goal?
The "money" excuse is the biggest beaten-to-death cop-out excuse of them all.
The "money" excuse is the biggest beaten-to-death cop-out excuse of them all.
It's not an excuse when it's a fact. Whatever makes the league the most money is what they are going to do. Even if every first round series were a 4-0 sweep (which, to my knowledge, has never happened) that 1 extra game per series means a lot of money to the league. As I said in my previous post, these games aren't being played in half empty arenas.
You can complain about the quality of the games all that you want, but unless and until people stop showing up to watch them, we're probably lucky that the NBA isn't looking to expand the playoffs further.
Using this same "logic", I guess the NFL should eliminate wild-card byes. After all, more games equals more money. That's the whole point of any business.![]()
I am all on board with that. You get your home field advantage, why have a bye.Using this same "logic", I guess the NFL should eliminate wild-card byes. After all, more games equals more money. That's the whole point of any business.![]()
Unless the NBA went to a best of 3, Love and Irving injuries still would happen
And had it been a 5 Game Series, the Spurs, not the Clippers, would have advanced.
I wouldn't have had a problem with the Spurs advancing instead of the Clippers. They certainly wouldn't have let Houston off the hook like the Clippers did.
Omg yes.
the best of 7 is way too long, especially when you have tehse dominant higher rated seeds playing these lower seeds that sometimes have losing records going into the playoffs.
I don't need to see Cleveland destroy some 8th seeded East team with a losing record 4 straight times in a borefest.
best of 5 was awesome, and actually provides more chance of upsets. Usually, usually your only good first round match ups are the 4/5 3/6. But again, best of 7 is just too long for round 1.
Would love to see them go back to best of 5.
Finally, someone without a fixed perspective was able to post on this thread. LOL
The "money" excuse is the biggest beaten-to-death cop-out excuse of them all. .
not 2+2+1 format I want to see 1+1+1+1+1 format.
yes but more rest for the players and a little more fair format.I hope you're kidding. That would make a 5 game series longer than a 7 game series with the travel days in between.
yes but more rest for the players and a little more fair format.
Just my opinion. I like it. Its just like in a best of 7 2-3-2 format favors the away team. They need to change formats. I guess u are right about the fair point in the 1st rd. There should be a disadvantage.Sooo, a longer post season with fewer games. That'll be a huge hit.
And why does the format need to be more "fair?" Why try to diminish HCA?
Just my opinion. I like it. Its just like in a best of 7 2-3-2 format favors the away team. They need to change formats. I guess u are right about the fair point in the 1st rd. There should be a disadvantage.
oh I agree no way NBA would do it because of money. Only way is if the players took a stand and I don't see that.While I do understand the point of going back to the 5 game format, there's just no way that will happen. Playoffs only expand or stay out, they never contract. There's too much money involved.
Like I said earlier, if those extra first round games were being played in half empty arenas, then there might be a possibility. But they're not. Even the tv ratings aren't too bad for first round games because there are enough junkies like those of us on this board who will watch.