SonnyCID
Conocido Miembro
Sherman shouldn't change for anyone. Drive is a funny thing, many successful people are batshit crazy.
By the way, do Seahawk fans still think Sherman was being sincere when he said "good game" at the end of their last match? I remember that getting thrown around a lot immediately after that game.
Speaking for myself, no I don't, it was a"fuck you" good game remark. I just always felt that was the right of the winner, losers should just bit their tongue and vow to get him next time.
Owning up and admitting you were wrong on that. Respect.
I was never wrong on that, folks just started getting crazy about me defending Sherman, that I never really had a chance to explain my position on the 49er board.
Not much for exchanging ideas on that board.
Thought I remembered you using the reasoning that he was being sincere since he said good game, or something along those lines.
I may be wrong though. I've been wrong in the past, and I will be wrong some time in the future.
I just didn't explain it well to start, and then things really went south quickly, so I went away. The thing is that the 49er board has a small group that shouts troll when ever any body who isn't a 49er gives a rebuttal.
Yea, I remember people were calling for your head lol.
I thought it was a bit much, but in all honesty, I thought you were talking out of your ass too. So I didn't have a big problem with it. Again, that's just from what I remember from a while ago which may or may not be accurate.
The bold part of what you said here is bullshit though. You're over-generalizing.
Nah, most 49ers posters are A OK, but their are at least a couple that stick to the 49er board and hate outsiders posting on the board, they act like it's their personal board. You don't get the same reaction on other active boards. At least that has been my experience.
Meh. I could ask for you to name the specific people from the 49ers board so that I can prove to you that this is not always the case. But I'm not particularly interested in doing that. Let's just agree to disagree.
Have a good one.
From what I know about the two players, I've gotta say that Sherman probably instigated this. But still, I kind of like the grudge match. It just adds another layer on top of a huge rivalry.
Now I know that Sherman thrives off of this kind of stuff. I'm just hoping that Crabs responds to it on the field. Maybe this career-long battle pushes both players to the very peak of their physical abilities for years to come.
First of all, why do you continue to obsess over what Seahawk fans think?By the way, do Seahawk fans still think Sherman was being sincere when he said "good game" at the end of their last match? I remember that getting thrown around a lot immediately after that game.
First of all, why do you continue to obsess over what Seahawk fans think?
Sherman's game isn't that hard to understand. He gets players off their game by being physical and mentally getting to them. Every time we hear what he says in game when he is mic'ed up he is jabbering away at whoever he is playing.
There is no way they don't have bad blood through their meetings.
I'm not sure what sincere is supposed to mean in this case. I'm sure he was an ass during the game. He feels he was trying to be a good sport after the game, but of course crabs wasn't going to just drop it and shake his hand. He had just been smoked on that play by a guy he freaking hates and the realization that it just ended their season was setting in.
They hated each other before this and Sherman's public BS is all just part of his act going into the next meeting where he will again use it to get in his head.
Who cares?
They both don't like each other.
Sherman tries to get in the heads of his opponents and likely had crab really pissed off.
Crab was just dealing with the end of the season on a play he got beat on.
Sherman has a history of being intense during, and just after the end of games (don't you ever talk about...).
No one has any fucking clue what was in his head when he did it. And no one has any doubt he felt dissed by crabs reaction. And no one should be surprised Sherman can't/won't let it go.
All of it makes sense on it's own.
And lol at using Harolds opinion as some end-all reason to justify your bringing this up.
Obviously I care enough to discuss it. Not sure why that's a problem. If you don't care, you're not obligated to participate.
So we come full circle back to your preoccupation with Seattle then...