Liberal Icon
Well-Known Member
Sharapova was one of the main reasons I watched women's tennis.
We know. You have a blow- up doll Of Sharapova on your bed side.
Sharapova was one of the main reasons I watched women's tennis.
I am sure if it were Serena you will say the same thing. Hypocrite.
Serena has won a lot and also displayed mysterious illnesses, so the charges would be pretty legitimate. So yes a two or three year ban would be sufficient.
It's better than your blow-up doll of Hillary Clinton.
it's her and every tennis player's responsibility to make sure anything they put in their bodies isn't on the WADA list of banned substances.I suppose I'm on the fence whether or not the drugs should be banned to begin with, but I have a hard time buying the notion that she "didn't know", so any suspension she gets is karma.
Too bad, she seems like a classy gal.
but this happens across ALL sports, so I have a hard time believing it is 100% the athletes' faults. Maybe it is the product for not being transparent, but somewhere the ball is being dropped.it's her and every tennis player's responsibility to make sure anything they put in their bodies isn't on the WADA list of banned substances.
whether it was intentional has nothing to do with it.
it takes 5 seconds to find the list online (Welcome to the List | Wada Prohibited List), and they're all given a phone number they can call 24/7 to make sure they're not taking a banned substance.
it would be one thing if it were asking a lot of players. it isn't. it's basic accountability that applies to all pro tennis players.
but this happens across ALL sports, so I have a hard time believing it is 100% the athletes' faults. Maybe it is the product for not being transparent, but somewhere the ball is being dropped.
I have a hard time believing they all cheat willingly when they know how easy it is to get caught.
I don't think Sharapova was trying to get away with anything, but it's her responsibility at all times to know if anything she's putting in her body is on the banned list. The ITF and WADA beg athletes to keep up to date at all times (there's an online list, and phone number to call 24/7), and Sharapova knows as well as anybody that the list changes constantly.
It has nothing to do with intentions.
All valid excuses...for forgetting to pick up an ingredient for tonight's dinner at the store.In her case, she has so many irons in the fire that it is possible she just did not have time to check. Most tennis players are just tennis players. They practice and play tournaments. Sharapova has all kinds of business interests and modeling/appearance gigs to do.
I can't really argue with you, she's a pro and she was at best careless, at worst cheating.All valid excuses...for forgetting to pick up an ingredient for tonight's dinner at the store.
I don't think it's too much to ask any athlete to take "the time" to make sure they're not taking a banned substance when the ITF and WADA do everything short of tattooing them with the list to make it accessible.
I think they should have punished her by making her play naked for 2 years.
She'd probably start getting saggy and wrinkly after that.
I have no problem with the reduced ban time. I really don't think Sharapova knew that what she was taking had been added to the list. That doesn't change the fact that it's her responsibility (and that of all athletes) to make sure she's not taking a banned substance. All things considered, the time she'll end up serving with the ban seems about right to me.
That's why there's an appeals process in place, and it worked out for the best, IMO. It just irks me a little that she's still blaming the ITF to any degree. They are very clear with all athletes about the WADA list, and the consequences of doping, whether it's intentional or not.