- Thread starter
- #341
elocomotive
A useful idiot.
What?!? The fuck?!?
Interference no goal.
Yeah it is no goal and shouldn't have been. But to say he plowed into him is a major stretch.Fuck it, plow straight into the goalie after he makes a save
That's probably why the challenge review was so quick. He had already seen during the first review that it wouldn't stand up to a challenge. Has to wait for the coach to challenge it though.They need to look at that rule next year. The ref can't look for interference the first time they reviewed it? You shouldnt have to challenge that.
Is Pittsburgh even going to be able to field a team by the end of this game?
This defence is beer league level lately
Fun to watch though
Running through the glove when he's getting the glove on it is probably more accurate, yes.
How about during the Rico Fata era?