Not really, they just quoted the rule, anyone can do that. It was such a bad call, the league needs to get heat for that regardless of the outcome of the game.Dude get over it, the league clearly stated why it wasn’t a goal whether you like it or not.
Did you read what you posted? They literally quoted the rule that exists for the exact reason of what played out.Not really, they just quoted the rule, anyone can do that. It was such a bad call, the league needs to get heat for that regardless of the outcome of the game.
Dude get over it, the league clearly stated why it wasn’t a goal whether you like it or not.
It doesn’t matter what analysts or people on Twitter think about good goals or not, they’re paid to talk, it matters what the league thinks and by the rule they set in place, it wasn’t a goal.lol - The league just puts out that drivel to cover their butt. Did you read Elliotte's tweet, he thought it was a good goal. Three of the four guys on the TNT panel thought it was a good goal, the only one who didn't was Lundqvist, the former goalie (shocker).
The league and the crew in the SR were probably thinking the same...and breathing a sigh of relief.Well at least now that call doesn't really matter
Avs went 0-3 at home, that’s the main reason they lost this series. You can‘t even win 1 game on your home ice you don’t deserve to move on.
I would add. "depending on how it ends"Nothing better than a couple of cups of coffee and a couple of periods of OT hockey.
This former goalie thought it was a goal. On the next Goalie Union zoom call, I am going to submit a motion to educate young Henreek that it's okay to say some goals count.lol - The league just puts out that drivel to cover their butt. Did you read Elliotte's tweet, he thought it was a good goal. Three of the four guys on the TNT panel thought it was a good goal, the only one who didn't was Lundqvist, the former goalie (shocker).