WhiteMamba
John: 8:36
Should have just used the top 4 from the BCS...
Have no idea why they didnt do this.
Should have just used the top 4 from the BCS...
Should have just used the top 4 from the BCS...
Winner.
I have hated the idea of a selection committee since the first time ESPN started pushing for it.
Teams win titles, not conferences. Over half of your conference is terrible. You can pimp out Bama if you want, they're about the only legit BCS title contender in the SEC. If UF had any kind of offense, ya'll would be up there, too....
-I've only heard that bs from whiners like yeo. NCAA don't give a shit about them.
Have no idea why they didnt do this.
The other nine members all primarily have ties to the major conferences, with the Pac-12 and Big Ten wielding the most weight. Four members have Pac-12 ties: USC AD Pat Haden, former NCAA executive and Oregon player Tom Jernstedt, former Stanford and Washington coach Tyrone Willingham, and current Stanford professor and former provost Condoleezza Rice. Rice is the one committee member that has never played college athletics nor worked in an athletic department. However, the Stanford AD did report to her in her role as provost.
While Rice may do a fine job as a member of this committee, and the people at the Playoff HQ are fawning all over her at every opportunity, I don't get her inclusion at all. I have a great deal of respect for her professional accomplishments, but she stands out as the least involved in college athletics, and football in particular, of any of her colleagues.
Three committee members have Big Ten ties, and two of those are Big Red. Tom Osborne is, of course, the legendary former Nebraska coach and athletic director, while Barry Alvarez played at Nebraska and is the Hall of Fame former coach of Wisconsin and now serves as AD. Willingham is a former player at Michigan State.
The SEC has three members with ties as well, if you count retired USA Today writer Steve Weiberg, who is a Missouri grad from back when the Tigers were in the Big Eight.