Screwed Again On The Schedule

[gkekoa]

Sure. And its possible i win the lottery. But it's unlikely as hell. Even at 0-2 the odds of going winless are very low.

The point wasnt to say that the pats are comparable. Simply that you listed every negative you could about this team and i could take the best organization in the league and do the same. Its just being negative for negativitys sake. Its not practical at all for either of us.

I didn’t say the likelihood wasn’t low. I said it is possible. I also said the likelihood increases when we lose to the two easiest games on the schedule.

If Brady and Gronk retire, their entire OL and entire DL break their necks bungee jumping, nobody would predict them to go winless.

 

[ehb5]

I didn’t say the likelihood wasn’t low. I said it is possible. I also said the likelihood increases when we lose to the two easiest games on the schedule.

If Brady and Gronk retire, their entire OL and entire DL break their necks bungee jumping, nobody would predict them to go winless.

If thats your point then fine. Id agree technically but I think its about as useful of a point as saying we could win the SB next year and that the odds increase if we start 2-0. Both claims are technically true but so what.

And fwiw...you did say "we could easily go winless".

I agree. Because nobody should ever predict anybody to go winless. Its a horrible prediction for any team.

 

[Skins2021]

If thats your point then fine. Id agree technically but I think its about as useful of a point as saying we could win the SB next year and that the odds increase if we start 2-0. Both claims are technically true but so what.

And fwiw...you did say "we could easily go winless".

I agree. Because nobody should ever predict anybody to go winless. Its a horrible prediction for any team.

going winless is more likely for the skins then winning the superbowl

 

[ehb5]

going winless is more likely for the skins then winning the superbowl

I disagree

 

[gkekoa]

If thats your point then fine. Id agree technically but I think its about as useful of a point as saying we could win the SB next year and that the odds increase if we start 2-0. Both claims are technically true but so what.

And fwiw...you did say "we could easily go winless".

I agree. Because nobody should ever predict anybody to go winless. Its a horrible prediction for any team.

We have a far greater chance of winless than we do the SB.

 

[ehb5]

We have a far greater chance of winless than we do the SB.

I disagree

 

[skinsdad62]

you know i was told the eagles and rams were "no brainer wins " by dean . that didnt turn out that way did it ? i think 6-7 wins with a good draft is about right

 

[Skins2021]

the thing I have found about the Skins is that when expectations are highest they usually stink up the joint and have double digit loss season.

however

when expectations are the lowest is when they surprise with a 9-7 season

my expectations are incredibly low so maybe they surprise and go 8-8 or 9-7

 

[Mitziman]

you know i was told the eagles and rams were "no brainer wins " by dean . that didnt turn out that way did it ? i think 6-7 wins with a good draft is about right

dean had it nailed if our former qb hadn't stunk up the joint in game one...but, that game probably "didn't matter" either did it dad.

 

[Sharkinva]

dean had it nailed if our former qb hadn't stunk up the joint in game one...but, that game probably "didn't matter" either did it dad.

Yep.. Cousins accounted for 270 of the 304 total yards the offense produced. He was the reason we lost that game. You need to get your homer glasses prescription checked.

 

[Mitziman]

Yep.. Cousins accounted for 270 of the 304 total yards the offense produced. He was the reason we lost that game. You need to get your homer glasses prescription checked.

He sure did. But, he also was responsible for 3 turnovers, and 0-2 in the redzone.

you might want to get your glasses checked as well my brother.

HTTR

 

[Sharkinva]

He sure did. But, he also was responsible for 3 turnovers, and 0-2 in the redzone.

you might want to get your glasses checked as well my brother.

HTTR

OH my vision is straight. IM going to hold Smith to the exact same standards Cousins was held to. And Im looking forward to seeing how many of the homers are much more forgiving of Smith than they were of Cousins.

 

[skinsdad62]

Ditto

 

[Breed]

Yes I'm sure. We arent one of the 3 worst teams in the past 30 years. That's ridiculous.

Not so ridiculous and not so far off.

 

[skinsdad62]

Yeah watching wentz torch the defense had nothing to do with it

 

[ehb5]

Not so ridiculous and not so far off.

I dont think you all are recognizing how difficult and rare it is to go winless.

 

[Sharkinva]

I dont think you all are recognizing how difficult and rare it is to go winless.

Are you saying that the Redskins front office is not talented enough to put together a roster capable of going 0-16??

 

[gkekoa]

I dont think you all are recognizing how difficult and rare it is to go winless.

Well it has happened at least a couple of times in the last 20 years...which is two more Super Bowls than we have.

 

[Breed]

I dont think you all are recognizing how difficult and rare it is to go winless.

I'm not talking about going winless. I was referring to the 'one of the worst teams the last 30 years.' comment. It could mean different things to different people.

 

[ehb5]

Are you saying that the Redskins front office is not talented enough to put together a roster capable of going 0-16??

Haha oh I dont doubt that. But with the current roster its a monumental long shot.