LA, could not support 1 teaam in the past. Now they have 2. What the F--- are they thinking? Somebody please explain. I hope both teams fail in LA.
Your call. Won't fault you either way. Hell I'd cheer for the LA Chargers if they're sold. I just can't support anything related to Spanos.I'm reserving the right to abandon my fanhood after 15 years if they keep penny pinching and making horrible roster decisions.
Outside of college football there isn't a single event in sports that pisses me off more than the draft. Horrible decision after horrible decision.
Your call. Won't fault you either way. Hell I'd cheer for the LA Chargers if they're sold. I just can't support anything related to Spanos.
I've beat this to death in other threads, so I'll just do a copy/paste job. Bottom line is the city had a great plan for the Qualcomm site, and could not get Spanos to even discuss it...No real disagreement here, but what was the alternative? They've been pushing for a new stadium for over a decade with each proposal falling flat on its face.
Most people in San Diego didn't see the need for a new stadium and were apathetic about a possible move to LA.
I just don't think you can fault him completely. Qualcomm has been a shithole for years. The last time it got a face lift was 1997 for $78 Million.
It hosted a Super Bowl in 2003 and this was the Commissioners reaction:
"I'm surprised that we are here this week," Tagliabue said before the Super Bowl. "If it weren't for [Chargers owner] Alex [Spanos] impressing upon the committee and upon the membership the importance of coming back here from his perspective, I don't think that San Diego would have been on the top of the list of most owners who were considering Super Bowl sites. So I don't think the outlook is promising. ... I think it's unlikely that there's going to be a Super Bowl in the immediate future in San Diego."
SF got a brand new stadium. Lambeau has had two nine figure face lifts.
The damn Raiders would have had that spot and we would have been stuck in purgatory.
What should he have done? Wait until it gets so bad that SD is forced to take a look in the mirror and realize that moving up the road was much better than the team leaving California altogether?
The critical moment came and passed with little resistance.
LA, could not support 1 teaam in the past. Now they have 2. What the F--- are they thinking? Somebody please explain. I hope both teams fail in LA.
The Rams left and the Raiders left. How is that statement false?How many times will this false statement be used?
I mean, damn, the Rams were here for 50 years.
The Rams left and the Raiders left. How is that statement false?