C
cubzzzfanincali
Guest
Noon, you and I were more or less in the same camp when Trestman was announced. I don't remember you being a one-man crusader, but you were somewhat unhappy about the hire. Somewhat grumbling, but not pissed. In my case, since I have a bias against Canadians, it couldn't be helped, I was annoyed but I almost immediately put it on ice. Both of us also, if I remember right, were in the minority camp who opposed the Lovie firing. But both of us...you and I both...quickly realized we should give the guy a chance. Which we did.
I think you turned on Trestman a little sooner than I did, but we are both there now. For my part, I think Emery is a bigger part of the problem, but Trestman wasn't hired as a HC in the NFL for a reason until Chicago, which is worth revisiting.
I don't know that Lovie would have done any better once he was finally given a sledload of free agent talent like Trestman was handed. Maybe it would have still sucked. But I am pretty sure our D would have been somewhat better. May be all beside the point, since as long as we have a QB that single-handedly destroys games for us, good D or bad D, at least at some point in any three game run, meaning a playoff run would be a waste anyway.
I think you turned on Trestman a little sooner than I did, but we are both there now. For my part, I think Emery is a bigger part of the problem, but Trestman wasn't hired as a HC in the NFL for a reason until Chicago, which is worth revisiting.
I don't know that Lovie would have done any better once he was finally given a sledload of free agent talent like Trestman was handed. Maybe it would have still sucked. But I am pretty sure our D would have been somewhat better. May be all beside the point, since as long as we have a QB that single-handedly destroys games for us, good D or bad D, at least at some point in any three game run, meaning a playoff run would be a waste anyway.