- Thread starter
- #1
idseer
Well-Known Member
personally, unless they get a good potential player along with the rangers paying his whole contract i'd hold onto him. he's a good player (sox don't have many) and depending on a rookie to come in and put up similar numbers would be very risky imo. we've been thru that before!
i don't think his contract is bad (like it once was) at all and hope the sox don't screw themselves like they so often do.
i don't think his contract is bad (like it once was) at all and hope the sox don't screw themselves like they so often do.