- Thread starter
- #1
One sentence in an email and the guy is guilty? Not surprised I guess with the Redskins logos you are all sporting.
There is no way the email is referring to other helmets? Personally, I don't care either way, but it's sad how this country assumes guilt so quickly these days.The helmets were not used in games, the scuff marks don't match up with the game film according to the expert. That is fraud. The email show Eli was involved in the fraud.
There is no way the email is referring to other helmets? Personally, I don't care either way, but it's sad how this country assumes guilt so quickly these days.
I never suggested anything should be ignored. He could very well be guilty. I just like to see all of the evidence before jumping on a guy.Exactly how else would you interpret "2 helmets that can pass as game used. That is it. Eli."? Why on earth would he ask for helmets that appear to be game used?
I'm not assuming guilt, we obviously need to learn more. But given the fact that the helmets that were purchased appear to be fake to totally ignore this evidence is kind of ignorant.
I never suggested anything should be ignored. He could very well be guilty. I just like to see all of the evidence before jumping on a guy.