WestEndVol
Rarest Member
...anyway, going to bed for real...I will ut up projections in the morning,
NIGHT!
Looking forward to our projection. Hope they aren't dumping us out of the SEC.
...anyway, going to bed for real...I will ut up projections in the morning,
NIGHT!
I think that what 46 is saying (about UNC) is that if they're willing to pull off Duke's tit, then they'll have options (at least one good option).I feel like the Pac isn't as desperate as the Big East was with their conference expansion. They could probably poach some schools out west and make it a viable 16-team league.
Teams like UNLV, SDST, Nevada, Fresno St, Boise St would all be viable options IMO. There are still plenty of decent teams to poach out west.
VT beat writer Andy Bitter was just asked "I’m hearing rumblings that the Big 12 and the SEC are in discussion about having their conference champs meeting in a bowl site. I’m betting it may be the Sugar Bowl. What’s your thought?" and his response: "Not just rumblings. It’s happening. It’ll be an entirely new bowl and it will be highly profitable, since it looks like the conferences themselves, and not some third-party bowl organization will run it. It’s a big deal. There are clearly four major conferences emerging, and the ACC is not one of them. This FSU saga is not going to go away after the latest news."
comments #3 and #4 here:
http://blogs.roanoke.com/andybitter.../05/18/better-know-a-12-opponent-austin-peay/
Andy Bitter reads my SportsHoopla!
I dunno there is a LOT of disdain for BSU in the PAC.
Much rather go to the Big12.
Why would the PAC even move off 12? What's to prevent them from staying with the mix they have?
That makes way too much sense.
In a sense the 16 team conferences is similar, because the divisions will hardly see each other and the CCG would be that first round.