- Thread starter
- #1
I'm not sure I understand your postLet's not forget why he was available in the fist place. Good luck with that Scott.
he means why scot was available. handling his drinkingI'm not sure I understand your post
The money Rak was looking for was not ever going to be given by the Skins, given his injury history and coming off a franchise tag year that saw .5 sack production from him.
Instead SM got value and talent elsewhere.
I see.he means why scot was available. handling his drinking
oh yeah this team could turn anyone into an alcoholicI see.
Well with Danny Boys personality he will need good luck in spades for sure![]()
I think the Culliver signing was one of the biggest because he is signed for 4 years. Pot Roast will be another Darryl Gardner, here for a year, blow up, then bolt for a bigger check.
Also Pot Roast is very good friends with Baker so that will motivate him to at least consider staying with the Redskins. In any case I would much rather have a situation like this where the team is risking losing a guy after one year than a Haynesworth type situation where you sign the wrong guy & basically screw the team over for many, many years.I remember Daryl Gardener's big year too. If Pot Roast play really well, GMSM will sign him to a good deal. One thing to remember is that it seems as though players generally like playing in D.C. And why wouldn't they? It's not as expensive as NYC or SF, not as remote as Seattle or Phoenix, not as crappy weather wise as Chicago, Cleveland, Buffalo, or Green Bay, and not quite as dysfunctional as Tampa Bay, or Oakland.
Plus, Dallas sucks.![]()
Also Pot Roast is very good friends with Baker so that will motivate him to at least consider staying with the Redskins. In any case I would much rather have a situation like this where the team is risking losing a guy after one year than a Haynesworth type situation where you sign the wrong guy & basically screw the team over for many, many years.